Court dismisses California membership lawsuit
Thursday, June 21, 2007
Filed Under:
Law
|
National
|
Politics
A California tribe that was terminated did not lose the right to define its membership after regaining recognition, a federal appeals court ruled on Wednesday.
In a unanimous decision, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said it would be wrong to treat restored tribes different from other tribes. Despite being terminated in 1958, the Mooretown Rancheria retained the right to set its membership criteria, a three-judge panel ruled.
"The termination and restoration of Mooretown Rancheria does not justify depriving it of its sovereign power to define its membership when it organized a tribal government in 1987," Judge Andrew J. Kleinfeld wrote.
The decision means the Bureau of Indian Affairs can't force the rancheria to enroll dozens of people who might otherwise qualify for membership. It was the plaintiffs, in fact, who were part of
the landmark
Tillie Hardwick litigation that resulted in several California tribes being restored to recognition.
But the plaintiffs were excluded from the Mooretown Rancheria because a different group established the tribe's membership criteria. As a result, their voting rights are restricted and
they cannot share in profits from a successful casino.
"Thus, although the plaintiffs are Concow-Maidu Indians descended from people who have
lived at Mooretown Rancheria for a very long time, they lack the rights of full members of the Mooretown Rancheria tribe," the court noted.
Despite the history, the court said it lacked the power to force the BIA to act. The judges noted that the agency -- which agreed to restore the tribes as part of the
Hardwick litigation -- did not play a role in reorganizing the rancheria.
"Uncontradicted evidence establishes that Mooretown Rancheria itself squeezed them out, and that it did not act at the behest of the BIA," the court said. "It did not need the
BIA’s permission and did not ask for it, and the BIA never purported to tell it how to define its membership."
At the same time, the 9th Circuit noted that tribal sovereignty can be affected by the federal government. "An Indian tribe has the power to define membership as it chooses, subject to the plenary power of Congress," Kleinfeld wrote for the panel.
Even then, the judges said sovereign immunity protects a tribe from suit without a voluntary waiver or a waiver from Congress. Citing U.S. Supreme Court precedent, the panel stated that "tribes remain quasi-sovereign nations which, by government structure, culture, and source of sovereignty are in many ways foreign to the constitutional institutions of the federal and
state governments."
The Mooretown plaintiffs sued the BIA in hopes of overcoming the tribal sovereignty hurdles. Other disenrolled California Indians have adopted similar strategies but the state and federal courts have refused to intervene in membership disputes so far.
Recognizing Congress' plenary power and pointing to the ouster of at least 1,500 California Indians, the American Indian Rights and Resource Organization has been seeking changes in federal law to allow membership disputes to be heard in federal court. Some leaders in the California Democratic party have taken up the cause amid charges that wealthy tribes are ousting people in order to limit per capita gaming payments.
Nationally, the issue has gained media and Congressional attention due to the ouster of the Freedmen, the descendants of African slaves, from the Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma. Rep. Diane Watson (D-California) is introducing a bill to cut federal funding to the tribe until it restores
citizenship to the Freedmen.
Court Decision:
Williams v. Gover (June 20, 2007)
Relevant Links:
Mooretown Rancheria history -
http://www.featherfallscasino.com/history.html
American Indian Rights and Resource Organization -
http://www.airro.org
Pechanga Tribal Disenrollment -
http://www.pechanga.info
Tribal Corruption -
http://www.tribalcorruption.com
Related Stories:
Ousted Redding Rancheria families protest
(6/21)
Rep. Watson to introduce Cherokee Freedmen bill
(6/21)
Column: Bill helps
wealthy tribes purge members (06/14)
Disenrolled Indians oppose exclusion bill in
California (6/7)
AIM leader criticizes
tribal disenrollments (5/3)
California
Democrats consider ICRA resolution (04/25)
Man seeks healing over Pechanga disenrollment
(03/13)
Pechanga Band runs ad against
disenrollment story (2/21)
Women
disenrolled after criticizing leaders (12/13)
USA Today: Tribes remove thousands from rolls
(11/29)
Chukchansi Tribe latest to disenroll
members (11/27)
Disenrolled Indians tie
ouster to tribal greed (11/24)
California Indians cite growing disenrollments
(11/08)
Former members protest Enterprise
Rancheria (10/05)
Expert disputes
Pechanga Band on disenrollment (09/25)
Opinion: Pechanga Band purges family of
heritage (09/05)
Column: Tribal nations
evict their own people (8/25)
Column:
Pechanga family and Pluto demoted (8/25)
Column: Pechanga Band decimating Indians (8/22)
Pechanga Band removes another family from
roll (8/21)
Disenrolled Indians seek
accountability (08/07)
Disenrollment an
issue in Pechanga Band election (07/13)
Greed, politics behind tribal enrollment spats
(07/06)
Ex-Table Mountain members protest at
powwow (06/12)
Editorial: Supreme Court
passes on sovereignty (05/29)
Pechanga
Band calls refusal of membership case a win (5/24)
Tribal membership case rejected by U.S. Supreme
Court (5/23)
California Indians protest
removal from tribes (05/01)
Campbell
amendment put to test in court case (4/21)
Another Pechanga family faces removal from
tribe (03/21)
Ousted Pechangas take case
to U.S. Supreme Court (3/17)
Identity
Theft: California Indians lose tribal rights (01/26)
BIA asked to rule on rancheria membership dispute
(1/20)
Disenrolled Indians to hold rally
in Palm Springs (1/10)
Disenrolled
Pechangas to take case to Supreme Court (12/15)
Per capita payments under tribal, federal
scrutiny (09/26)
Court won't take on
tribal enrollment dispute (9/14)
Pechanga Band says money not behind enrollment
(08/10)
Disenrollment suit dismissed in
California (8/9)
Ousted Pechangas plan
appeal of enrollment lawsuit (8/9)
Disenrolled Pechangas seek $38M in damages
(08/04)
Pechanga Band enrollment dispute
closely watched (07/11)
Court hears
Pechanga Band enrollment dispute (7/7)
McKosato: Greed behind ouster of tribal members
(05/23)
Opinion: Gaming has turned
tribes on other tribes (5/20)
Ousted
Redding Rancheria members head to forum (5/19)
Forum calls attention to tribal disenrollments
(5/18)
Family fights disenrollment from
Sauk-Suiattle Tribe (5/18)
California AIM
blames greed for mass disenrollments (5/16)
Editorial: Disenrollment becoming too common
(04/01)
Ousted Pechangas file another
lawsuit against tribe (03/28)
California
tribe changes status of some members (3/28)
Pechanga Band avoids dedication of city park
(03/09)
Woman ejected from Pechanga Band in
despair (01/27)
County investigates
shooting on Pechanga land (01/14)
State
judge won't dismiss lawsuit over tribal enrollment (07/27)
Pechanga Band votes to retain Macarro as chairman
(07/19)
Battle for top Pechanga post
heats up before vote (7/16)
Disenrolled
tribal members call for more oversight (07/15)
Ousted tribal members appeal to Pechanga
council (07/02)
Pechanga chairman faces
election challenge (07/02)
Judge
weighs ruling in Pechanga disenrollment (04/20)
2,000 California Indians face disenrollment
(04/14)
Pechanga descendants protest
against enrollment policy (04/06)
Opinion: Greed, spite, history behind
disenrollment (4/5)
Opinion: Calif.
tribes disenrolling more people (4/1)
Pechanga tribal committee disenrolls 130
people (03/22)
Calif. judge waits on
Pechanga enrollment dispute (02/18)
Calif. judge delays Pechanga Tribe's
disenrollment (02/05)
Judge won't
protect 130 from disenrollment (2/3)
Case tests Pechanga Tribe's right to disenroll
130 (02/02)
Adopted man protests
exclusion Pechanga Tribe (01/15)
Pechanga tribe threatens to cut off
newspaper (03/14)
Pechanga disenrollment campaign to
continue (02/25)
Pechanga
chairman surprised by his 'racist' statement (2/24)
Copyright © Indianz.Com