Elouise Cobell, the lead plaintiff in the Indian trust fund
lawsuit, will be answering questions about the proposed settlement to the
case. Cobell is a member of the Blackfeet Nation in Montana.
Dear Indian Country
This is the twelfth letter in a series of open letters that I’m sending to Indian Country. The purpose of this letter is to update you about the settlement and to answer your most relevant questions.
As I reported in the last letter, the House of Representatives voted to pass the “American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010” (“the Tax Extenders Bill”) before the Memorial Day holiday which included a provision authorizing the Cobell settlement. Unfortunately, on June 30, 2010, I learned our settlement would not be considered in a new version of the Senate Tax Extenders Bill. The new version failed to pass and the Senate could possibly consider it again in July. There is still a chance that we may be re-attached to that Bill, but the future of the Tax Extenders Bill is uncertain.
Following the failure of the Senate to pass the Tax Extenders Bill, our allies in the House of Representatives rallied to include our settlement on the war supplemental bill funding the Iraq and Afghanistan wars then being considered. This bill was passed by the House on the evening of July 1, 2010. The Senate did not consider the bill and is now on recess until Monday, July 12, 2010. We are urging our allies in the Senate to pass the war supplemental with the Cobell settlement.
The parties agreed to extend the settlement until July 9, 2010, so yet another extension is required if we are to give the Senate a chance to pass legislation. I will consult our attorneys and allies on the Hill about that extension over the next few days.
In your last letter, you mentioned that Senator Barrasso (R – WY), Vice-Chairman, Senator Committee on Indian Affairs introduced an amendment that he says would “improve” the settlement agreement even though it would terminate the settlement, what is the status of his amendment?
Thanks to your overwhelming support, Senator Barrasso was unable to bring his amendment to the floor for a vote. Your letters and calls to members of Congress had a significant impact on the outcome. Unfortunately, Senator Barrasso still doesn’t understand, or doesn’t care, that Indian Country overwhelmingly supports this settlement. According to statements reported in the press, he is more determined than ever to rob you of your victory in this case and it is likely that he again will attempt to introduce an amendment to terminate the settlement at some time in the future. We remain on guard against his efforts to further harm individual Indians.
You also mentioned that the National Congress of American Indians was considering a resolution supporting the Barrasso amendment, what is the status of that resolution?
I attended the NCAI event in Rapid City, South Dakota beginning June 20, 2010. A small, rabid group of tribal representatives sought to support Senator Barrasso’s amendment and, thereby, kill your settlement, but their effort was defeated soundly and NCAI passed a resolution urging Congress to reject the Barrasso amendment and pass authorizing legislation as soon as possible. It is important to remember that this class is made up solely of individual Indians trust beneficiaries; tribes have their own litigation (and, at times, the agenda of a few tribal leaders is inconsistent with individual Indians’ interests), but they don’t represent your interests in this litigation.
Will any Interior contractors with experience on Indian issues be selected to assist with the distribution of settlement proceeds or to hold the funds pending distribution?
Absolutely not. This is a conflict of interest. To allow the same contractors, who have been peddling their services that fail to deliver promised benefits to Indian Country, to have any role in the distribution of settlement funds would be insane. For the first time in history, your funds will be held securely, managed prudently, and distributed competently by able and experienced professionals. I know of no Interior contractors that meet the highest fiduciary standards that you are owed.
Where can I review the amount of time the attorneys have spent on the litigation?
Pursuant to an agreement between the parties, statements regarding counsels’ billing rates and related records supporting daily time, expense and cost records will be filed with the Court and available to the public. This documentation will be filed no later than 30 days following preliminary approval of the settlement agreement by the Court. Preliminary approval by the Court cannot occur unless and until Congress authorizes the settlement.
Prior Ask Elouise letters can be found on the settlement website: http://cobellsettlement.com/class/ask_elouise.php.
We also have a "frequently asked questions" section to answer the most
common questions we've received: http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php.
With so many members of the class, I can’t answer every question that you
send. The Ask Elouise letters will answer as many questions as possible that are
relevant to the entire class.
The most common question I receive every week relates to whether someone
is included in this settlement. Unfortunately, I do not have that information.
The settlement agreement provides general guidelines (see also http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php),
but I also understand that many of you have unique or unusual circumstances,
which make it unclear to me whether you are included in the settlement class.
For those of you who still have questions, I recommend that you register to
receive all Court-ordered communications to ensure you do not miss important
information. There is no need to register if you are receiving a quarterly IIM
statement. The Court ultimately will determine who is included in this
settlement. Registration information can be found at the end of this and every
Ask Elouise letter.
If you are not currently receiving an IIM statement from the government,
please remember to register for correspondence over the Internet or by calling
the number below.
Internet: https://cert.tgcginc.com/iim/register.php
Telephone:
1-800-961-6109
If you have a question, send an e-mail to:
askelouise@cobellsettlement.com. Otherwise you can send me a letter to the
address below. To expedite the processing of your letters our contractor has set
up a post office box in Ohio, but I assure you this letter is coming from me and
I will see your letters.
Ask Elouise
Cobell Settlement
PO Box 9577
Dublin, OH
43017-4877
Thank you and keep your questions coming!
Cobell Settlement Documents:
Agreement
| Press
Release | Q&A
| Audio
Related Stories:
CNC: Washington politics delaying passage of
Cobell settlement (7/7)
Cobell Letter: Sen. Barrasso
wrong over trust fund settlement (7/6)
Kimberly Craven: Obama not transparent on Cobell
settlement (7/6)
Blog: Elouise Cobell
never backed down from Indian trust fight (7/6)
House passes Cobell settlement under appropriations
measure (7/2)
Editorial: Set aside
partisan politics and pass Cobell settlement (7/2)
Cobell settlement in limbo after being removed from
Senate bill (7/1)
Editorial: Partisan
gridlock in Senate holds up Cobell settlement (7/1)
Sen. Barrasso: Trust fund settlement spends
taxpayer dollars (6/30)
Editorial:
Cobell settlement hits a partisan roadblock in Senate (6/29)
Supreme Court dismisses petition in Cobell
accounting appeal (6/28)
Editorial:
Barrasso should listen to tribes on Cobell settlement (6/28)
Senate Republicans block passage of bill with trust
settlement (6/25)
Kevin Abourezk: NCAI
passes resolution for Cobell settlement (6/24)
NCAI backs Cobell settlement, rejects Barrasso
amendment (6/23)
Supreme Court to
consider petition in Cobell trust fund case (6/23)
Turtle Talk: Trouble ahead if Supreme Court takes
on Cobell? (6/23)
NCAI weighs position
on amendment to trust fund settlement (6/22)
Sen. Barrasso hopes for vote on changes to Cobell
settlement (6/21)
Wyoming tribes oppose
amendment to trust fund settlement (6/18)
Editorial: Senate should approve Cobell trust fund
settlement (6/18)
Tribes complain about
NCAI letter on Cobell trust settlement (6/17)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about trust
settlement (6/16)
Parties agree to
extend deadline over trust fund settlement (6/16)
Official clarifies that NCAI 'firmly supports'
Cobell settlement (6/15)
Blackfeet
Nation slams NCAI over letter on Cobell settlement (6/15)
NCAI president writes letter on changes in Cobell
settlement (6/14)
Opinion: Republican
Senator threatens trust fund settlement (6/14)
Sen. Barrasso pushing amendment to trust fund
settlement (6/11)
Obama administration
against changes in Cobell settlement (6/10)
Bob Juneau: Pennies on the dollar for Cobell trust
settlement (6/9)
New Cobell case judge
backed Indian preference at Interior (6/7)
Opinion: Some justice for Indian Country in trust
settlement (6/7)
Cobell suit handed to
new judge after Robertson retirement (06/02)
Cobell speaks to graduates from Menominee Nation
college (06/02)
Sen. Barrasso seeks to
make changes to Cobell settlement (6/1)
Trust settlement awaits Senate action after House
passage (6/1)
Editorial: Trust
settlement is a victory for Native Americans (6/1)
Rep. Hastings loses bid to change terms of trust
settlement (5/28)
Congress fails to meet
deadline to act on Cobell settlement (5/28)
Editorial: Cobell settlement brings hope for Indian
Country (5/26)
White House statement
supports bill with trust settlement (5/25)
Votes expected this week on bill with trust fund
settlement (5/25)
Five Civilized
Freedmen seek a share of Cobell settlement (5/25)
Cobell trust fund settlement a part of jobs and tax
measure (5/24)
Editorial: Indian Country
deserves settlement to Cobell case (05/18)
White House press secretary mentions Cobell during
briefing (05/18)
Rep. Hastings insists
Congress not on 'deadline' over Cobell (5/14)
Kimberly Craven: Transparency needed for trust
settlement (5/13)
Sen. Coburn blocks
attempt to authorize Cobell settlement (5/10)
Angelique EagleWoman: Cobell deal bad for Indian
Country (5/10)
Three weeks before end of
last Cobell settlement deadline (5/7)
Cobell attorney says Congress can't change terms of
deal (5/6)
Elouise Cobell answering
questions about trust settlement (5/5)
Editorial: Congress must act quickly on Cobell
settlement (5/4)
Cobell criticizes Sen.
Barrasso for trying to 'kill' settlement (5/3)
Sen. Barrasso proposes changes to trust fund
settlement (04/28)
Editorial: Justice
delayed for Indian trust fund settlement (4/27)
House Speaker Pelosi backs settlement for Cobell
case (4/26)
Clock ticking for Congress
to approve Cobell settlement (4/26)
Harry Reid: Senate needs to act on trust fund
settlement (4/23)
Elouise Cobell answers
questions about trust settlement (4/21)
Rep. Rehberg pushes for action on trust fund
settlement (4/16)
UKB chief hopes
Congress acts on trust fund settlement (4/15)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about trust
settlement (4/13)
Editorial: Not another
14 years for Indian trust fund case (4/12)
Judge in trust fund case worried about delays in
settlement (4/9)
Judge urges Congress to
approve settlement in Cobell case (4/8)
Cobell responds to questions about trust fund
settlement (4/7)
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
back settlement to Cobell case (4/1)
Gyasi Ross: Cobell a hero and warrior for Indian
Country (3/31)
Cobell discusses trust
fund settlement at Yakama Nation (3/31)
Cobell to discuss settlement at conference in New
Mexico (3/29)
Cobell team to discuss
trust fund settlement in Wyoming (3/25)
Cobell responds to questions about trust fund
settlement (3/24)
Cobell discusses
settlement on Fort Belknap Reservation (3/24)
Cobell asks for support to approve trust fund
settlement (3/23)
Cobell team heads to
Idaho to talk trust fund settlement (3/23)
Cobell holds settlement meetings in Washington,
Oregon (3/22)
Great Plains tribal
leaders raise Cobell settlement issues (3/22)
Cobell settlement discussions in Montana, South
Dakota (3/19)
Elouise Cobell responds to
questions about settlement (3/16)
Kimberly Craven: Cobell deal wrong for Indian
Country (3/16)
Editorial: Congress must
act soon on Cobell settlement (3/16)
Cobell team in Arizona, New Mexico to brief
settlement (3/15)
Editorial: It's time
to settle the Cobell trust fund lawsuit (3/15)
Editorial: It's time to settle the Cobell trust
fund lawsuit (3/15)
South Dakota tribes
weigh stance on Cobell settlement (3/11)
Audio: House Resources hearing on Cobell settlement
(3/10)
Congress slow to move on Cobell
trust fund settlement (3/10)
Witness
list for House hearing on trust fund settlement (3/9)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about
settlement (3/9)
Elouise Cobell to meet
with landowners in South Dakota (3/5)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about
settlement (3/2)
House Resources
Committee schedules Cobell hearing (3/2)
Deadline in Cobell trust fund case extended to
April 16 (3/1)
Elouise Cobell answers
questions about settlement (2/22)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about settlement
(2/17)
Opinion: Questions remain about
Cobell settlement (2/9)
Opinion: Cobell
case settled for pennies on the dollar (2/8)
Opinion: Cobell trust settlement addresses land
issues (02/01)
Deadline approaches to
approve trust fund settlement (02/01)
Dennis Gingold: The facts behind trust fund
settlement (1/29)
Bill Martin: No rubber
stamp for trust fund settlement (1/26)
Editorial: Congress must act fast on Cobell
settlement (1/22)
Chickasaw firm secures
land consolidation contract (1/21)
Opinion: Indian trust beneficiaries finally getting
paid? (1/20)
Interview with Elliott
Levitas, attorney for Cobell case (1/18)
Millions coming to Montana under Cobell
settlement (01/07)
Congress gets more
time to act on Cobell settlement (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell
lawsuit (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue
settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Letters: A good settlement to Indian trust fund
case (12/21)
Cobell urges Senate to move
quickly on settlement (12/18)
Column:
Free Indians of federal government control (12/18)
Column: Cobell deal not so great for Indian Country
(12/18)
Editorial: Cobell deal corrects
century-old old wrong (12/18)
Editorial:
Settlement and accountability in trust fund (12/18)
Witness List: Senate hearing on Cobell settlement
(12/16)
Mary Pember: The small picture
of the Cobell deal (12/16)
Opinion: Deal
won't change much in Indian Country (12/16)
Editorial: Settlement in Cobell case is long
overdue (12/16)
Editorial: Act quickly
to approve Cobell settlement (12/16)
Bill Means: Cobell settlement a rip-off for Indians
(12/15)
Editorial: At last a settlement
in Cobell trust case (12/15)
North
Dakota tribes back settlement in Cobell case (12/14)
Opinion: Indian plaintiff won't see trust
settlement (12/14)
Column: Navajo woman
helped resolve Cobell case (12/14)
Editorial: Preventing future trust mismanagement
(12/14)
Editorial: Approve settlement to
Cobell trust case (12/14)
Senate
committee sets Cobell settlement hearing (12/11)
Washington tribes react to Cobell case settlement
(12/11)
Editorial: Land consolidation
program 'worrisome' (12/11)
Lynne
Harlan: A new era in federal Indian relations (12/11)
Column: Cowboy banks got paid more than Indians
(12/11)
Editorial: Settling more than a
century of injustice (12/11)
Editorial:
Support settlement for Cobell trust case (12/11)
Editorial: Acknowledge past mistakes in trust fund
(12/11)
Editorial: A long overdue
settlement to Cobell suit (12/11)
NARF
welcomes settlement in Cobell trust lawsuit (12/10)
Cobell hailed as warrior as she returns to Montana
(12/10)
Billings Paper: Cobell deal
sends $27M to Montana (12/10)
Editorial:
Cobell settlement fair for Indian Country (12/10)
Editorial: Welcome settlement to Cobell trust case
(12/10)
Mostly praise for $3.4B
settlement to Cobell lawsuit (12/9)
Editorial: Act quickly on Indian trust fund
settlement (12/9)
Twitter Recap of
Cobell settlement with Photos (12/8)
Statement by President Obama on Cobell settlement
(12/8)
Statement by Sen. Dorgan on
Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by
Sen. McCain on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Tester on Cobell settlement
(12/8)
Statement by Rep. Rahall on Cobell
settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Cole
and Rep. Kildee on Cobell settlement (12/8)
'Major' announcement on Indian trust management
(12/8)
Trending in News
1 White House Council on Native American Affairs meets quick demise under Donald Trump
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
More Stories
Share this Story!
You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.
All stories in the Indianz.Com Archive are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)