Elouise Cobell, the lead plaintiff in the Indian trust fund
lawsuit, will be answering questions about the proposed settlement to the
case. Cobell is a member of the Blackfeet Nation in Montana.
Dear Indian Country
This is the eleventh letter in a series of open letters that I’m sending to Indian Country. The purpose of this letter is to update you about the settlement and to let you know what you can do to help.
Before the Memorial Day holiday, the House of Representatives voted to pass the “American Jobs and Closing Tax Loopholes Act of 2010” which includes a provision authorizing the Cobell settlement. This is good news and we now await approval in the Senate. I hope that the Senate passes the bill before the July 4 recess, but there is a chance that might not happen.
Individual Indian trust beneficiaries have expressed their overwhelming support for this settlement. Not only does it put $1.4 billion into the hands of individual Indians in a relatively short period of time, but it promises to make another $2 billion available to individual Indians over the next ten years, preserve sacred Indian lands for future generations and create a fund for post-secondary education worth up to $60 million. This is the largest settlement/judgment against the United States since the founding of the Republic and we have a unique opportunity to right an historic injustice. For these reasons I intend to direct our attorneys to work with the government to extend the settlement agreement yet again so that justice may have a chance. However, every extension of time delays the distribution of our settlement funds. Enough is enough. Further, there are a few tribal leaders in Indian Country, some with misguided intentions, who want to terminat e the settlement for their own personal purposes.
Senator Barrasso (R – WY), Vice-Chairman, Senator Committee on Indian Affairs, has introduced an amendment that he says would “improve” the settlement agreement. However, the agreement provides that the settlement terminates if there are any changes to its terms. Senator Barrasso knows this and he knows that adoption of his amendment would kill the settlement. Why? He is playing Washington politics because the dirty truth is that he would vote against the current Senate bill even if his amendment is adopted.
Tribal leaders should know better (and most do) than to support a new Senator from Wyoming who rarely, if ever, has supported Indians. Senator Barrasso has made an effort to gain support from certain leaders in Indian Country for his amendment. He argues that his amendment really does not make significant changes to the settlement. Of course, most tribal leaders and individual Indian trust beneficiaries are not buying it. Still, there are a few wrong-headed tribal leaders who support his plan to kill our agreement. If your tribal leaders are voting to change the settlement in any way, they are helping Senator Barrasso kill our settlement and they are depriving you of your money. They do not deserve your vote and should be voted out of office if they stand for re-election. Have your friends and family demand that their tribal representatives support our settlement.
Understanding who is with us and who is against us is important because the National Congress of American Indians says that it will consider a resolution that would help Senator Barrasso kill the Cobell settlement during its conference June 20-23, 2010. If you don’t know whether your representative to NCAI is with you on Cobell, make sure you find out in advance. Any legislative changes to the settlement agreement will terminate the settlement.
Let me also stress that most tribal leaders support our settlement. I thank each of you for resisting the efforts of Senator Barrasso and his staff to undermine what we have achieved.
Will the Native American Bank hold the settlement funds or have any role in distribution?
I am the Chair of Native American Bank and I have been asked whether Native American Bank would handle or otherwise be involved in the distribution of our settlement funds. The answer is no. The settlement agreement sets forth standards for selection of a federally insured depository institution that would hold and distribute the settlement funds. Only well capitalized commercial banks with trust powers are eligible for selection (and, the Native American Bank has no trust powers). Only banks with highly rated trust departments and proven experience and skill in the distribution of class action mega-settlements will be considered for this important task. We must be sure that prompt and accurate distributions are made by bankers who understand fully the nature and scope of their fiduciary duties to you. Anything less isn’t good enough.
Does this settlement resolve any future claims?
No. The settlement agreement resolves only covered claims through September 30, 2009. It does not resolve any claims that may accrue after September 30, 2009. A list of claims not covered by the settlement agreement (e.g., pre-September 30, 2009 claims that may be brought against the government) can be reviewed here and here. For a complete list of claims, you should consult the settlement agreement.
What does settlement of the Cobell case mean for the tribes and tribal trust cases?
Tribes are not parties in our case and would receive no funds from our settlement. Nevertheless, they are beneficiaries of our settlement. We have over 80 published decisions and an encyclopedia of factual findings that have been established in Cobell regarding the government’s trust duties, information technology security, and the destruction of trust records and information. Volumes have been written on the government’s breaches of trust. This material provides a free roadmap to litigation success and it is readily available to tribes in connection with their trust litigation against the government if they decide to actually litigate their cases. On the other hand, I understand that most tribal cases have been dormant (while they have observed our litigation) and their attorneys would prefer a quick settlement so they don’t need to spend the time and resources required to litigate effectively against the United States government. Nonetheless, such tribes and their attorneys are likely to be disappointed because it is also my understanding from conversations with senior Interior and Justice officials and certain tribal attorneys that there will be no settlement with any tribe if Cobell is not settled.
Finally, tribes will benefit directly from the $2 billion land consolidation program which would result in the largest restoration of land to Indian tribes in the history of the United States. It still amazes me that tribal leaders would oppose our multi-billion dollar settlement that so clearly benefits them and their members – even though they, themselves, didn’t do anything to help us. However, this is not the first time in our history that some of our leaders have decided to sacrifice individual Indian interests for their political gain. I am working hard to see that they fail and urge you to do the same.
Prior Ask Elouise letters can be found on the settlement website: http://cobellsettlement.com/class/ask_elouise.php.
We also have a "frequently asked questions" section to answer the most common
questions we've received: http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php.
With so many members of the class, I can’t answer every question that you send. The Ask Elouise letters will answer as many questions as possible that are relevant to the entire class.
The most common question I receive every week relates to whether someone is
included in this settlement. Unfortunately, I do not have that information. The
settlement agreement provides general guidelines (see also http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php),
but I also understand that many of you have unique or unusual circumstances,
which make it unclear to me whether you are included in the settlement class.
For those of you who still have questions, I recommend that you register to
receive all Court-ordered communications to ensure you do not miss important
information. There is no need to register if you are receiving a quarterly IIM
statement. The Court ultimately will determine who is included in this
settlement. Registration information can be found at the end of this and every
Ask Elouise letter.
If you are not currently receiving an IIM statement from the government, please
remember to register for correspondence over the Internet or by calling the
number below.
Internet: https://cert.tgcginc.com/iim/register.php
Telephone:
1-800-961-6109
If you have a question, send an e-mail to: askelouise@cobellsettlement.com. Otherwise you can send me a letter to the address below. To expedite the processing of your letters our contractor has set up a post office box in Ohio, but I assure you this letter is coming from me and I will see your letters.
Ask Elouise
Cobell Settlement
PO Box 9577
Dublin, OH 43017-4877
Thank you and keep your questions coming!
Cobell Settlement Documents:
Agreement
| Press
Release | Q&A
| Audio
Related Stories:
Official clarifies that NCAI 'firmly supports'
Cobell settlement (6/15)
Blackfeet Nation slams NCAI over letter on
Cobell settlement (6/15)
NCAI president writes
letter on changes in Cobell settlement (6/14)
Opinion: Republican Senator threatens trust fund
settlement (6/14)
Sen. Barrasso pushing
amendment to trust fund settlement (6/11)
Obama administration against changes in Cobell
settlement (6/10)
Bob Juneau: Pennies on
the dollar for Cobell trust settlement (6/9)
New Cobell case judge backed Indian preference at
Interior (6/7)
Opinion: Some justice for
Indian Country in trust settlement (6/7)
Cobell suit handed to new judge after Robertson
retirement (06/02)
Cobell speaks to
graduates from Menominee Nation college (06/02)
Sen. Barrasso seeks to make changes to Cobell
settlement (6/1)
Trust settlement awaits
Senate action after House passage (6/1)
Editorial: Trust settlement is a victory for Native
Americans (6/1)
Rep. Hastings loses bid
to change terms of trust settlement (5/28)
Congress fails to meet deadline to act on Cobell
settlement (5/28)
Editorial: Cobell
settlement brings hope for Indian Country (5/26)
White House statement supports bill with trust
settlement (5/25)
Votes expected this
week on bill with trust fund settlement (5/25)
Five Civilized Freedmen seek a share of Cobell
settlement (5/25)
Cobell trust fund
settlement a part of jobs and tax measure (5/24)
Editorial: Indian Country deserves settlement to
Cobell case (05/18)
White House press
secretary mentions Cobell during briefing (05/18)
Rep. Hastings insists Congress not on 'deadline'
over Cobell (5/14)
Kimberly Craven:
Transparency needed for trust settlement (5/13)
Sen. Coburn blocks attempt to authorize Cobell
settlement (5/10)
Angelique EagleWoman:
Cobell deal bad for Indian Country (5/10)
Three weeks before end of last Cobell settlement
deadline (5/7)
Cobell attorney says
Congress can't change terms of deal (5/6)
Elouise Cobell answering questions about trust
settlement (5/5)
Editorial: Congress
must act quickly on Cobell settlement (5/4)
Cobell criticizes Sen. Barrasso for trying to
'kill' settlement (5/3)
Sen. Barrasso
proposes changes to trust fund settlement (04/28)
Editorial: Justice delayed for Indian trust fund
settlement (4/27)
House Speaker Pelosi
backs settlement for Cobell case (4/26)
Clock ticking for Congress to approve Cobell
settlement (4/26)
Harry Reid: Senate
needs to act on trust fund settlement (4/23)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about trust
settlement (4/21)
Rep. Rehberg pushes
for action on trust fund settlement (4/16)
UKB chief hopes Congress acts on trust fund
settlement (4/15)
Elouise Cobell answers
questions about trust settlement (4/13)
Editorial: Not another 14 years for Indian trust
fund case (4/12)
Judge in trust fund
case worried about delays in settlement (4/9)
Judge urges Congress to approve settlement in
Cobell case (4/8)
Cobell responds to
questions about trust fund settlement (4/7)
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes back settlement to Cobell
case (4/1)
Gyasi Ross: Cobell a hero and
warrior for Indian Country (3/31)
Cobell
discusses trust fund settlement at Yakama Nation (3/31)
Cobell to discuss settlement at conference in New
Mexico (3/29)
Cobell team to discuss
trust fund settlement in Wyoming (3/25)
Cobell responds to questions about trust fund
settlement (3/24)
Cobell discusses
settlement on Fort Belknap Reservation (3/24)
Cobell asks for support to approve trust fund
settlement (3/23)
Cobell team heads to
Idaho to talk trust fund settlement (3/23)
Cobell holds settlement meetings in Washington,
Oregon (3/22)
Great Plains tribal
leaders raise Cobell settlement issues (3/22)
Cobell settlement discussions in Montana, South
Dakota (3/19)
Elouise Cobell responds to
questions about settlement (3/16)
Kimberly Craven: Cobell deal wrong for Indian
Country (3/16)
Editorial: Congress must
act soon on Cobell settlement (3/16)
Cobell team in Arizona, New Mexico to brief
settlement (3/15)
Editorial: It's time
to settle the Cobell trust fund lawsuit (3/15)
Editorial: It's time to settle the Cobell trust
fund lawsuit (3/15)
South Dakota tribes
weigh stance on Cobell settlement (3/11)
Audio: House Resources hearing on Cobell settlement
(3/10)
Congress slow to move on Cobell
trust fund settlement (3/10)
Witness
list for House hearing on trust fund settlement (3/9)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about
settlement (3/9)
Elouise Cobell to meet
with landowners in South Dakota (3/5)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about
settlement (3/2)
House Resources
Committee schedules Cobell hearing (3/2)
Deadline in Cobell trust fund case extended to
April 16 (3/1)
Elouise Cobell answers
questions about settlement (2/22)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about settlement
(2/17)
Opinion: Questions remain about
Cobell settlement (2/9)
Opinion: Cobell
case settled for pennies on the dollar (2/8)
Opinion: Cobell trust settlement addresses land
issues (02/01)
Deadline approaches to
approve trust fund settlement (02/01)
Dennis Gingold: The facts behind trust fund
settlement (1/29)
Bill Martin: No rubber
stamp for trust fund settlement (1/26)
Editorial: Congress must act fast on Cobell
settlement (1/22)
Chickasaw firm secures
land consolidation contract (1/21)
Opinion: Indian trust beneficiaries finally getting
paid? (1/20)
Interview with Elliott
Levitas, attorney for Cobell case (1/18)
Millions coming to Montana under Cobell
settlement (01/07)
Congress gets more
time to act on Cobell settlement (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell
lawsuit (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue
settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Letters: A good settlement to Indian trust fund
case (12/21)
Cobell urges Senate to move
quickly on settlement (12/18)
Column:
Free Indians of federal government control (12/18)
Column: Cobell deal not so great for Indian Country
(12/18)
Editorial: Cobell deal corrects
century-old old wrong (12/18)
Editorial:
Settlement and accountability in trust fund (12/18)
Witness List: Senate hearing on Cobell settlement
(12/16)
Mary Pember: The small picture
of the Cobell deal (12/16)
Opinion: Deal
won't change much in Indian Country (12/16)
Editorial: Settlement in Cobell case is long
overdue (12/16)
Editorial: Act quickly
to approve Cobell settlement (12/16)
Bill Means: Cobell settlement a rip-off for Indians
(12/15)
Editorial: At last a settlement
in Cobell trust case (12/15)
North
Dakota tribes back settlement in Cobell case (12/14)
Opinion: Indian plaintiff won't see trust
settlement (12/14)
Column: Navajo woman
helped resolve Cobell case (12/14)
Editorial: Preventing future trust mismanagement
(12/14)
Editorial: Approve settlement to
Cobell trust case (12/14)
Senate
committee sets Cobell settlement hearing (12/11)
Washington tribes react to Cobell case settlement
(12/11)
Editorial: Land consolidation
program 'worrisome' (12/11)
Lynne
Harlan: A new era in federal Indian relations (12/11)
Column: Cowboy banks got paid more than Indians
(12/11)
Editorial: Settling more than a
century of injustice (12/11)
Editorial:
Support settlement for Cobell trust case (12/11)
Editorial: Acknowledge past mistakes in trust fund
(12/11)
Editorial: A long overdue
settlement to Cobell suit (12/11)
NARF
welcomes settlement in Cobell trust lawsuit (12/10)
Cobell hailed as warrior as she returns to Montana
(12/10)
Billings Paper: Cobell deal
sends $27M to Montana (12/10)
Editorial:
Cobell settlement fair for Indian Country (12/10)
Editorial: Welcome settlement to Cobell trust case
(12/10)
Mostly praise for $3.4B
settlement to Cobell lawsuit (12/9)
Editorial: Act quickly on Indian trust fund
settlement (12/9)
Twitter Recap of
Cobell settlement with Photos (12/8)
Statement by President Obama on Cobell settlement
(12/8)
Statement by Sen. Dorgan on
Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by
Sen. McCain on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Tester on Cobell settlement
(12/8)
Statement by Rep. Rahall on Cobell
settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Cole
and Rep. Kildee on Cobell settlement (12/8)
'Major' announcement on Indian trust management
(12/8)
Trending in News
1 White House Council on Native American Affairs meets quick demise under Donald Trump
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
2 'A process of reconnecting': Young Lakota actor finds ways to stay tied to tribal culture
3 Jenni Monet: Bureau of Indian Affairs officer on leave after fatal shooting of Brandon Laducer
4 'A disgraceful insult': Joe Biden campaign calls out Navajo leader for Republican speech
5 Kaiser Health News: Sisters from Navajo Nation died after helping coronavirus patients
More Stories
Share this Story!
You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.
All stories in the Indianz.Com Archive are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)