Commentary: Critics of Cobell Lamberth shortsighted
Facebook Twitter Email
MONDAY, JULY 21, 2003

Critics of the Cobell plaintiffs and federal district court Judge Royce Lamberth aren't seeing the big picture of the Indian trust fund fiasco, attorney Lee Helfrich contends.

Helfrich, who is in private practice, writes about the case for The Washington Post's opinion and commentary section. She say the problems it has uncovered show how a legal principle known as Chevron deference -- the practice of courts deferring to the federal agencies -- needs limits.

"The Indian Trust Fund case is not about bureaucratic business as usual. It is not about Interior and Justice executing their respective responsibilities with the comfort of knowing the 'Chevron deference' will apply," Helfrich says. "Instead it is about a standard of ethics. The U.S. government bears a fiduciary duty to Native Americans -- the highest duty recognized under law."

Those who question Lamberth's "peculiar dialogue" in the case are misplaced, she also says. "There is no room for 'sham' proceedings and 'sanitized' reports in the handbag of a fiduciary. Fiduciaries are required instead to 'defer' to the best interests of their beneficiaries."

Get the Story:
An Interior Case That Lays Bare Government as Usual (The Washington Post 7/20)

Today on Indianz.Com:
Contempt charges against Interior vacated (7/21)

Relevant Links:
Indian Trust: Cobell v. Norton -
Cobell v. Norton, Department of Justice -
Indian Trust, Department of Interior -

Related Stories:
Norton cleared of contempt on trust fund (7/18)
Congress hacks Bush's accounting funds (7/16)
Trust fund provision stripped from House bill (7/15)
Swimmer partly right on trust fund rider (7/14)
Hearsay: House sending message to Lamberth (7/14)
Bill could strip DOI of trust fund management (7/14)
Bush official balks at large settlement for Cobell (7/10)
House takes testimony on trust fund settlement (7/10)
Editorial: Shame on Bush and Congress for rider (7/10)
Judge Lamberth hears closing arguments in Cobell trial (7/9)
Closing arguments set in Cobell trust fund trial (7/8)
Dicks pins anti-Cobell language on Taylor (7/7)
Editorial: Trust fund settlement bill 'disgraceful' (7/7)
Swimmer to appear on Native America Calling (7/7)
Swimmer finally off the stand in Cobell trial (7/3)
Swimmer testimony in Cobell trial wrapping up (7/2)
Swimmer recalls 'fuzzy' Reagan years (7/1)
Lamberth questions Norton's trust limits (7/1)
Pombo targets trust fund settlement program (6/30)
Swimmer testifies on trust fund accounting (6/27)
Swimmer challenged on Bush reform plans (6/27)
Swimmer expected to take stand in Cobell trial (6/25)
Griles gets Cobell wish list from House (6/26)
Taxpayers fund private attorneys to tune of $3M (6/25)
Norton offered settlement funds for IIM trust (6/20)
Swimmer testimony to come at end of Cobell trial (06/05)
Cason to take stand in Indian trust fund trial (6/4)
Indian trust standards debated (6/3)
Suit aims to halt reorganization (6/3)
Norton starts defense in trust fund trial (6/2)
Tribes stress unity on trust reform solutions (6/2)
Cobell welcomes a settlement to trust case (5/29)
Lamberth criticizes interference with trust fund case (05/22)
Tribes oppose OST expansion into Indian County (5/22)
Swimmer: Don't fear changes at Interior (5/22)
On trust, Swimmer turns to private sector (5/14)
Trial in Cobell trust fund case kicks off (05/02)
Bush reform plans debated in trust fund trial (05/02)
Cobell v. Norton Recap: Day 1 of Trial 1.5 (05/02)
Court tackles trust accounting and reform plans (05/01)
Court hears Norton's trust fund appeal (4/25)