Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
ads@blueearthmarketing.com   712.224.5420

Cobell
Elouise Cobell provides update about status of trust settlement


Elouise Cobell, the lead plaintiff in the Indian trust fund lawsuit, will be answering questions about the proposed settlement to the case. Cobell is a member of the Blackfeet Nation in Montana.

Dear Indian Country

This is the thirteenth letter in a series of open letters that I’m sending to Indian Country. The purpose of this letter is to update you about the settlement.

Since my last Ask Elouise letter, I have been monitoring the Senate and its consideration of the supplemental bill funding the Iraq and Afghanistan wars to which we were attached by the House some time ago. Unfortunately, Senate leadership stripped our authorizing legislation from the war appropriations bill for political reasons unrelated to the merits of our settlement.

It is a difficult political environment on Capitol Hill, with a number of Members focused on reelection politics, not our much needed legislation. Our legislation efforts are complicated by record deficits, a weak national economy, and the requirement that $2 billion of our settlement be paid for through spending or revenue “off-sets.” This year, most legislation, excluding emergency spending legislation, has designated off-sets, but off-sets have become very controversial because each political party has its own views on the “acceptable off-sets.” Unfortunately, Congress has repeatedly taken our identified off-sets that were deemed widely acceptable to support other bills that were more important to Senate leadership and the Administration.

And, unfortunately, the Administration has been unwilling to designate any of the billions of dollars of unspent economic stimulus funds to ensure passage of our settlement bill. This has forced us to start over repeatedly as our Congressional allies have to work even harder to identify other possible acceptable off-sets.

Throughout the rest of the session which ended August 5, I and our attorneys continued to work with our allies in the Senate to get attached to a bill that the Senate would pass. Before the Senate recessed, leadership brought our case to a vote through a procedure called “unanimous consent.” This simply means that the Senate could pass the bill so long as no Senator objects; if any Senator objects, the bill does not pass. This measure did not pass as a result of Senator Barrasso’s (R-WY) ongoing objection to the settlement. As I reported in an earlier Ask Elouise letter, Senator Barrasso hasn’t made a secret of his desire to kill the settlement, going against the will of the tribes in his own state and all but a handful of disgruntled critics.

It is becoming more likely that Congress will not pass settlement legislation. Indeed, it is unusual for any settlement or judgment to be conditioned on political acceptance by Congress. The Judgment Fund, a permanently appropriated fund, was created decades ago by Congress to pay for all settlements and judgments against the United States. It has two purposes: first, to exclude final judgments and settlements against the United States from the uncertainties of the political process and, second, to restore the reputation of the United States, which had become a “deadbeat” nation. Simply put, “politics” routinely blocked payment of the government’s debt obligations. Sadly, we seem to be heading that way again. Our settlement agreement was executed on December 7, 2009 – over eight months ago – and, I know of no reason to believe that our prospects will improve as we get closer to the mid-term elections. In fact, they are likely to get worse.

Nevertheless, after endless hearings and debates in Congress about our case and its settlement, we have gathered a massive amount of support from Members of Congress. I am informed that if we ever come to a vote in the Senate that we have sufficient votes to safely beat any filibuster. For this reason, I have carefully considered our options, consulted with scores of beneficiaries, listened to their concerns, and talked to our attorneys before making a decision to extend the agreement for what is likely to be the last time. I’m especially mindful of the fact that the vast majority of beneficiaries want this settlement to work because it is a fair deal. For these reasons, I’ve decided to extend the settlement agreement through October 15, 2010.

Prior Ask Elouise letters can be found on the settlement website: http://cobellsettlement.com/class/ask_elouise.php.

We also have a "frequently asked questions" section to answer the most common questions we've received: http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php.

With so many members of the class, I can’t answer every question that you send. The Ask Elouise letters will answer as many questions as possible that are relevant to the entire class.

The most common question I receive every week relates to whether someone is included in this settlement. Unfortunately, I do not have that information. The settlement agreement provides general guidelines (see also http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php), but I also understand that many of you have unique or unusual circumstances, which make it unclear to me whether you are included in the settlement class. For those of you who still have questions, I recommend that you register to receive all Court-ordered communications to ensure you do not miss important information. There is no need to register if you are receiving a quarterly IIM statement. The Court ultimately will determine who is included in this settlement. Registration information can be found at the end of this and every Ask Elouise letter.

If you are not currently receiving an IIM statement from the government, please remember to register for correspondence over the Internet or by calling the number below.

Internet: https://cert.tgcginc.com/iim/register.php
Telephone: 1-800-961-6109

If you have a question, send an e-mail to: askelouise@cobellsettlement.com. Otherwise you can send me a letter to the address below. To expedite the processing of your letters our contractor has set up a post office box in Ohio, but I assure you this letter is coming from me and I will see your letters.

Ask Elouise
Cobell Settlement
PO Box 9577
Dublin, OH 43017-4877

Thank you and keep your questions coming!

Cobell Settlement Documents:
Agreement | Press Release | Q&A | Audio

Related Stories:
Cobell attorney calls on Obama to lobby stronger for settlement (8/9)
Sen. Barrasso blocks Senate action on Cobell trust fund settlement (8/6)
Richard Monette: Trust settlement only fair to plaintiffs and lawyers (8/5)
Editorial: Senate balks again at authorizing Cobell trust settlement (8/5)
Elouise Cobell: Another unfounded attack on trust fund settlement (8/4)
Sen. Baucus: Putting principles before politics on Cobell settlement (8/3)
TPM: Vote on Cobell, African American farmer settlements delayed (8/3)
Senate vote anticipated this evening on bill with Cobell settlement (8/2)
Kimberly Craven: Congress should do more work on Cobell lawsuit (8/2)
Senate plans separate legislation for Cobell trust fund settlement (7/30)
Sen. Reid hopes to take action on trust fund settlement this week (7/28)
Cobell remains hopeful despite Senate inaction on settlement bill (7/26)
Elouise Cobell statement on status of trust settlement in Congress (7/23)
Sen. Reid statement on failure to authorize trust fund settlement (7/23)
Senate removes Cobell settlement from appropriations measure (7/23)
Letter: Congress doesn't want individual Indians to get their funds (7/21)
Elouise Cobell: Criticism of trust fund settlement is unwarranted (7/13)
Editorial: Congress should approve Indian trust fund settlement (7/12)
Parties agree to set August 6 deadline for trust fund settlement (7/12)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about trust fund settlement (7/9)
CNC: Washington politics delaying passage of Cobell settlement (7/7)
Cobell Letter: Sen. Barrasso wrong over trust fund settlement (7/6)
Kimberly Craven: Obama not transparent on Cobell settlement (7/6)
Blog: Elouise Cobell never backed down from Indian trust fight (7/6)
House passes Cobell settlement under appropriations measure (7/2)
Editorial: Set aside partisan politics and pass Cobell settlement (7/2)
Cobell settlement in limbo after being removed from Senate bill (7/1)
Editorial: Partisan gridlock in Senate holds up Cobell settlement (7/1)
Sen. Barrasso: Trust fund settlement spends taxpayer dollars (6/30)
Editorial: Cobell settlement hits a partisan roadblock in Senate (6/29)
Supreme Court dismisses petition in Cobell accounting appeal (6/28)
Editorial: Barrasso should listen to tribes on Cobell settlement (6/28)
Senate Republicans block passage of bill with trust settlement (6/25)
Kevin Abourezk: NCAI passes resolution for Cobell settlement (6/24)
NCAI backs Cobell settlement, rejects Barrasso amendment (6/23)
Supreme Court to consider petition in Cobell trust fund case (6/23)
Turtle Talk: Trouble ahead if Supreme Court takes on Cobell? (6/23)
NCAI weighs position on amendment to trust fund settlement (6/22)
Sen. Barrasso hopes for vote on changes to Cobell settlement (6/21)
Wyoming tribes oppose amendment to trust fund settlement (6/18)
Editorial: Senate should approve Cobell trust fund settlement (6/18)
Tribes complain about NCAI letter on Cobell trust settlement (6/17)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about trust settlement (6/16)
Parties agree to extend deadline over trust fund settlement (6/16)
Official clarifies that NCAI 'firmly supports' Cobell settlement (6/15)
Blackfeet Nation slams NCAI over letter on Cobell settlement (6/15)
NCAI president writes letter on changes in Cobell settlement (6/14)
Opinion: Republican Senator threatens trust fund settlement (6/14)
Sen. Barrasso pushing amendment to trust fund settlement (6/11)
Obama administration against changes in Cobell settlement (6/10)
Bob Juneau: Pennies on the dollar for Cobell trust settlement (6/9)
New Cobell case judge backed Indian preference at Interior (6/7)
Opinion: Some justice for Indian Country in trust settlement (6/7)
Cobell suit handed to new judge after Robertson retirement (06/02)
Cobell speaks to graduates from Menominee Nation college (06/02)
Sen. Barrasso seeks to make changes to Cobell settlement (6/1)
Trust settlement awaits Senate action after House passage (6/1)
Editorial: Trust settlement is a victory for Native Americans (6/1)
Rep. Hastings loses bid to change terms of trust settlement (5/28)
Congress fails to meet deadline to act on Cobell settlement (5/28)
Editorial: Cobell settlement brings hope for Indian Country (5/26)
White House statement supports bill with trust settlement (5/25)
Votes expected this week on bill with trust fund settlement (5/25)
Five Civilized Freedmen seek a share of Cobell settlement (5/25)
Cobell trust fund settlement a part of jobs and tax measure (5/24)
Editorial: Indian Country deserves settlement to Cobell case (05/18)
White House press secretary mentions Cobell during briefing (05/18)
Rep. Hastings insists Congress not on 'deadline' over Cobell (5/14)
Kimberly Craven: Transparency needed for trust settlement (5/13)
Sen. Coburn blocks attempt to authorize Cobell settlement (5/10)
Angelique EagleWoman: Cobell deal bad for Indian Country (5/10)
Three weeks before end of last Cobell settlement deadline (5/7)
Cobell attorney says Congress can't change terms of deal (5/6)
Elouise Cobell answering questions about trust settlement (5/5)
Editorial: Congress must act quickly on Cobell settlement (5/4)
Cobell criticizes Sen. Barrasso for trying to 'kill' settlement (5/3)
Sen. Barrasso proposes changes to trust fund settlement (04/28)
Editorial: Justice delayed for Indian trust fund settlement (4/27)
House Speaker Pelosi backs settlement for Cobell case (4/26)
Clock ticking for Congress to approve Cobell settlement (4/26)
Harry Reid: Senate needs to act on trust fund settlement (4/23)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about trust settlement (4/21)
Rep. Rehberg pushes for action on trust fund settlement (4/16)
UKB chief hopes Congress acts on trust fund settlement (4/15)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about trust settlement (4/13)
Editorial: Not another 14 years for Indian trust fund case (4/12)
Judge in trust fund case worried about delays in settlement (4/9)
Judge urges Congress to approve settlement in Cobell case (4/8)
Cobell responds to questions about trust fund settlement (4/7)
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes back settlement to Cobell case (4/1)
Gyasi Ross: Cobell a hero and warrior for Indian Country (3/31)
Cobell discusses trust fund settlement at Yakama Nation (3/31)
Cobell to discuss settlement at conference in New Mexico (3/29)
Cobell team to discuss trust fund settlement in Wyoming (3/25)
Cobell responds to questions about trust fund settlement (3/24)
Cobell discusses settlement on Fort Belknap Reservation (3/24)
Cobell asks for support to approve trust fund settlement (3/23)
Cobell team heads to Idaho to talk trust fund settlement (3/23)
Cobell holds settlement meetings in Washington, Oregon (3/22)
Great Plains tribal leaders raise Cobell settlement issues (3/22)
Cobell settlement discussions in Montana, South Dakota (3/19)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about settlement (3/16)
Kimberly Craven: Cobell deal wrong for Indian Country (3/16)
Editorial: Congress must act soon on Cobell settlement (3/16)
Cobell team in Arizona, New Mexico to brief settlement (3/15)
Editorial: It's time to settle the Cobell trust fund lawsuit (3/15)
Editorial: It's time to settle the Cobell trust fund lawsuit (3/15)
South Dakota tribes weigh stance on Cobell settlement (3/11)
Audio: House Resources hearing on Cobell settlement (3/10)
Congress slow to move on Cobell trust fund settlement (3/10)
Witness list for House hearing on trust fund settlement (3/9)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about settlement (3/9)
Elouise Cobell to meet with landowners in South Dakota (3/5)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about settlement (3/2)
House Resources Committee schedules Cobell hearing (3/2)
Deadline in Cobell trust fund case extended to April 16 (3/1)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about settlement (2/22)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about settlement (2/17)
Opinion: Questions remain about Cobell settlement (2/9)
Opinion: Cobell case settled for pennies on the dollar (2/8)
Opinion: Cobell trust settlement addresses land issues (02/01)
Deadline approaches to approve trust fund settlement (02/01)
Dennis Gingold: The facts behind trust fund settlement (1/29)
Bill Martin: No rubber stamp for trust fund settlement (1/26)
Editorial: Congress must act fast on Cobell settlement (1/22)
Chickasaw firm secures land consolidation contract (1/21)
Opinion: Indian trust beneficiaries finally getting paid? (1/20)
Interview with Elliott Levitas, attorney for Cobell case (1/18)
Millions coming to Montana under Cobell settlement (01/07)
Congress gets more time to act on Cobell settlement (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Letters: A good settlement to Indian trust fund case (12/21)
Cobell urges Senate to move quickly on settlement (12/18)
Column: Free Indians of federal government control (12/18)
Column: Cobell deal not so great for Indian Country (12/18)
Editorial: Cobell deal corrects century-old old wrong (12/18)
Editorial: Settlement and accountability in trust fund (12/18)
Witness List: Senate hearing on Cobell settlement (12/16)
Mary Pember: The small picture of the Cobell deal (12/16)
Opinion: Deal won't change much in Indian Country (12/16)
Editorial: Settlement in Cobell case is long overdue (12/16)
Editorial: Act quickly to approve Cobell settlement (12/16)
Bill Means: Cobell settlement a rip-off for Indians (12/15)
Editorial: At last a settlement in Cobell trust case (12/15)
North Dakota tribes back settlement in Cobell case (12/14)
Opinion: Indian plaintiff won't see trust settlement (12/14)
Column: Navajo woman helped resolve Cobell case (12/14)
Editorial: Preventing future trust mismanagement (12/14)
Editorial: Approve settlement to Cobell trust case (12/14)
Senate committee sets Cobell settlement hearing (12/11)
Washington tribes react to Cobell case settlement (12/11)
Editorial: Land consolidation program 'worrisome' (12/11)
Lynne Harlan: A new era in federal Indian relations (12/11)
Column: Cowboy banks got paid more than Indians (12/11)
Editorial: Settling more than a century of injustice (12/11)
Editorial: Support settlement for Cobell trust case (12/11)
Editorial: Acknowledge past mistakes in trust fund (12/11)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell suit (12/11)
NARF welcomes settlement in Cobell trust lawsuit (12/10)
Cobell hailed as warrior as she returns to Montana (12/10)
Billings Paper: Cobell deal sends $27M to Montana (12/10)
Editorial: Cobell settlement fair for Indian Country (12/10)
Editorial: Welcome settlement to Cobell trust case (12/10)
Mostly praise for $3.4B settlement to Cobell lawsuit (12/9)
Editorial: Act quickly on Indian trust fund settlement (12/9)
Twitter Recap of Cobell settlement with Photos (12/8)
Statement by President Obama on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Dorgan on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. McCain on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Tester on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Rahall on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Cole and Rep. Kildee on Cobell settlement (12/8)
'Major' announcement on Indian trust management (12/8)