Elouise Cobell responds to questions about settlement
Elouise Cobell, the lead plaintiff in the Indian trust fund lawsuit, will be answering questions about the proposed settlement to the case. Cobell is a member of the Blackfeet Nation in Montana.

This is the fourth letter in a series of open letters I?m sending to Indian Country to answer questions that you have asked me about settlement of the Cobell class action lawsuit. Prior Ask Elouise letters can be found on the settlement website: http://cobellsettlement.com/class/ask_elouise.php.

We also have a “frequently asked questions” section to answer many of the most common questions we’ve received. http://cobellsettlement.com/press/faq.php. I can’t answer every question, but I will try to answer as many as I can every week.

When will you be meeting with Indian Country?
I am beginning to schedule meetings in Indian Country with our attorney team now. I won?t be able to attend each meeting, but I will do my best to attend as many as my schedule permits. I attended our first meetings on the Pine Ridge and Rosebud Indian Reservations on March 7th and 8th. Tomorrow (March 9th) our attorneys will be at the Eagle Butte, SD, High School Auditorium from 10:30am to 2:30pm and at Sitting Bull College in Fort Yates, ND (Science & Technology Center Lecture Room) from 5:00pm to 8:00pm. The travel schedule for March 10th and 11th is:
Wednesday, March 10
1:00 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Sisseton/Lake Traverse Reservation SWO Community Center
Sisseton, SD

Thursday, March 11
1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
Yankton Indian Reservation Fort Randall Casino & Hotel - Bingo Hall
Pickstown, SD

You can visit http://cobellsettlement.com/class/local_outreach.php for additional details and future dates and locations. I'll also update our travel schedule in future Ask Elouise letters. More dates will be added soon, including Nebraska reservations, and Arizona and New Mexico reservations beginning March 15.

Why have you not traveled to Indian Country before now?
During the course of negotiations, the government resisted allocating any funds for outreach to Indian Country prior to the passage of legislation, despite our strong feelings that it was important to meet with Indian Country to explain the settlement. The government instead assured us that legislation would be passed a few weeks after we signed the settlement agreement on December 7, 2009, and that outreach to Indian Country would take place under the normal notice process in class action lawsuits, which would include extensive travel to Indian Country. Unfortunately, legislation was not passed (and has still not been passed) and the need to meet with Indian Country is stronger than ever. As you know, traveling to many areas of Indian Country is expensive and time consuming, but it is critical, and I can no longer wait for legislation.

I heard that my settlement check will not be taxable, is this true?
That is correct. We negotiated with the government to include a provision in the legislation and settlement agreement that provides that all settlement proceeds are not considered taxable income by the Internal Revenue Service. If you have a tax preparer or other tax professional you should make sure to inform them of this important settlement benefit. You may want to refer them specifically to the legislation when it is passed and page 42 of the settlement agreement, if they have any questions. A copy of the settlement agreement can be downloaded here: http://cobellsettlement.com/docs/2009.12.07_Settlement_Agreement.pdf.

I receive federal assistance and I am concerned that receiving a settlement check will affect my eligibility or benefits, what should I do?
You don't have to do anything. The legislation negotiated by the parties provides that the settlement proceeds received will not be treated as income in the month received or as a resource for a period of one year after you receive your check. Congress is currently considering this legislation.

How much will I receive as part of this settlement?
While it is not possible to precisely calculate how much any particular individual will receive as part of this settlement, I have asked the government to provide a rough approximation of what each individual may receive as a member of the trust administration class. In my next Ask Elouise letter I intend to provide an estimate of the amount you may receive if you are in the trust administration class.

In your last Ask Elouise letter you indicated that I could remain in the trust administration class and still sue the government for claims related to leases that were active on September 30, 2009, is there any limitation?
Yes, there is a limitation. To the extent the government is acting in any capacity other than as a trustee, you may bring a lawsuit against the government for leases active on September 30, 2009. That means, for example, if the Department of Energy or Department of Agriculture or Department of Defense are leasing or trespassing on your land as of September 30, 2009, you may bring a lawsuit against the government and still participate as a class member in the trust administration class. Moreover, your fiduciary related claims are also preserved where the lease in question predates September 30, 2009, but the injury occurs after September 30, 2009. For a complete list of claims you may bring against the government and continue to remain in the trust administration class, please see pages 44 and 45 of the settlement agreement. http://cobellsettlement.com/docs/2009.12.07_Settlement_Agreement.pdf.

If you are not currently receiving an IIM statement from the government, please remember to register for correspondence over the Internet or by calling the number below.

Internet: https://cert.tgcginc.com/iim/register.php
Telephone: 1-800-961-6109

If you have a question, send an e-mail to: askelouise@cobellsettlement.com.

Otherwise you can send me a letter to the address below. To expedite the processing of your letters our contractor has set up a post office box in Ohio, but I assure you this letter is coming from me and I will see your letters.

Ask Elouise
Cobell Settlement
PO Box 9577
Dublin, OH 43017-4877

Thank you and keep your questions coming!

Relevant Documents:
Agreement | Press Release | Q&A | Audio

Related Stories:
Elouise Cobell to meet with landowners in South Dakota (3/5)
Elouise Cobell responds to questions about settlement (3/2)
House Resources Committee schedules Cobell hearing (3/2)
Deadline in Cobell trust fund case extended to April 16 (3/1)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about settlement (2/22)
Elouise Cobell answers questions about settlement (2/17)
Opinion: Questions remain about Cobell settlement (2/9)
Opinion: Cobell case settled for pennies on the dollar (2/8)
Opinion: Cobell trust settlement addresses land issues (02/01)
Deadline approaches to approve trust fund settlement (02/01)
Dennis Gingold: The facts behind trust fund settlement (1/29)
Bill Martin: No rubber stamp for trust fund settlement (1/26)
Editorial: Congress must act fast on Cobell settlement (1/22)
Chickasaw firm secures land consolidation contract (1/21)
Opinion: Indian trust beneficiaries finally getting paid? (1/20)
Interview with Elliott Levitas, attorney for Cobell case (1/18)
Millions coming to Montana under Cobell settlement (01/07)
Congress gets more time to act on Cobell settlement (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell lawsuit (1/6)
Letters: A good settlement to Indian trust fund case (12/21)
Cobell urges Senate to move quickly on settlement (12/18)
Column: Free Indians of federal government control (12/18)
Column: Cobell deal not so great for Indian Country (12/18)
Editorial: Cobell deal corrects century-old old wrong (12/18)
Editorial: Settlement and accountability in trust fund (12/18)
Witness List: Senate hearing on Cobell settlement (12/16)
Mary Pember: The small picture of the Cobell deal (12/16)
Opinion: Deal won't change much in Indian Country (12/16)
Editorial: Settlement in Cobell case is long overdue (12/16)
Editorial: Act quickly to approve Cobell settlement (12/16)
Bill Means: Cobell settlement a rip-off for Indians (12/15)
Editorial: At last a settlement in Cobell trust case (12/15)
North Dakota tribes back settlement in Cobell case (12/14)
Opinion: Indian plaintiff won't see trust settlement (12/14)
Column: Navajo woman helped resolve Cobell case (12/14)
Editorial: Preventing future trust mismanagement (12/14)
Editorial: Approve settlement to Cobell trust case (12/14)
Senate committee sets Cobell settlement hearing (12/11)
Washington tribes react to Cobell case settlement (12/11)
Editorial: Land consolidation program 'worrisome' (12/11)
Lynne Harlan: A new era in federal Indian relations (12/11)
Column: Cowboy banks got paid more than Indians (12/11)
Editorial: Settling more than a century of injustice (12/11)
Editorial: Support settlement for Cobell trust case (12/11)
Editorial: Acknowledge past mistakes in trust fund (12/11)
Editorial: A long overdue settlement to Cobell suit (12/11)
NARF welcomes settlement in Cobell trust lawsuit (12/10)
Cobell hailed as warrior as she returns to Montana (12/10)
Billings Paper: Cobell deal sends $27M to Montana (12/10)
Editorial: Cobell settlement fair for Indian Country (12/10)
Editorial: Welcome settlement to Cobell trust case (12/10)
Mostly praise for $3.4B settlement to Cobell lawsuit (12/9)
Editorial: Act quickly on Indian trust fund settlement (12/9)
Twitter Recap of Cobell settlement with Photos (12/8)
Statement by President Obama on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Dorgan on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. McCain on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Sen. Tester on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Rahall on Cobell settlement (12/8)
Statement by Rep. Cole and Rep. Kildee on Cobell settlement (12/8)
'Major' announcement on Indian trust management (12/8)

This story is tagged under:
Search
Share this Story!

You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.

All stories in the Indianz.Com Archive are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)