A slide from Cherokee Nation Chief Chad Smith's presentation at Indian law conference. Photo © NSM.
Provisions addressing the Cherokee Freedmen
will be added to a bill to reauthorize the Indian Health Care Improvement Act
, a key Senate staffer said on Friday.
After a year-long effort, the Senate passed S.1200
on February 26. But as the House considers its version of the bill,
the citizenship status of the Freedmen, who are the descendants of African slaves, within the Cherokee Nation
is affecting debate.
"We have been told it will have a Cherokee provision added to it," Allison Binney, the staff director for the Democratic majority of the Senate Indian Affairs Indian Committee
, said at the 33rd annual Indian law conference hosted by the Federal Bar Association
Last fall, the House included a Cherokee provision to H.R.2786
a bill to reauthorize the Native American Housing and Self-Determination Act
. The measure cuts federal funds to the Cherokee Nation unless the Freedmen are restored to citizenship.
"It's a great bill otherwise," Binney said of the legislation, which has not passed the Senate.
Senate leaders are now facing pressure to act. Members of the Congressional Black Caucus
recently told Majority Leader
(D-Nevada) they will block NAHASDA until the Freedmen issue is addressed.
Cherokee Chief Chad Smith called such efforts an affront to tribal sovereignty. He also spoke at the Indian law conference, which was held in Albuquerque, New Mexico, last week.
"They will attach it to every single Indian proposal," Smith said of efforts by the CBC, which represents over 40 lawmakers in the House and the Senate, including Sen. Barack Obama
Smith said he met with CBC members a year ago as the controversy was developing on Capitol Hill. He said they refused his pleas to hold off their legislation until the federal and tribal courts resolve the matter.
"We should let the courts decide," said Smith, who is an attorney.
At the same time, Smith said his own tribe's Supreme Court
made a "questionable" decision when it ruled the Freedmen were eligible for citizenship.
The ruling led to March 2007 referendum in which the majority of tribal members voted to oust African-Americans who are unable to trace their Indian ancestry to the federal government's Dawes Rolls
On the federal level, the tribe awaits a May 6 hearing before the D.C. Circuit Court of
. The tribe is challenging its inclusion in a lawsuit brought by Cherokee Freedmen descendants, led by Marilyn Vann, who spoke at the law conference last year.
Vann initially sued the Interior Department but Judge Henry
said the tribe lost its sovereign immunity through a post-Civil War treaty and the Thirteenth
to the U.S. Constitution, which outlawed slavery. The tribe contends it can't be sued without its consent.
The Bureau of Indian Affairs has warned the tribe that the 1866
protects the Freedmen. In a May 2007 letter, assistant secretary Carl Artman
said the tribe agreed to recognize the Freedmen's citizenship rights in exchange for ongoing recognition from the U.S.
Back on Capitol Hill, staffer Binney said her boss, Sen. Byron Dorgan
(D-North Dakota), the chairman of the Indian Affairs Committee, and others will face a tough challenge in the next couple of months as NAHASDA moves forward. "Do they push a bill that has [potential] to do great for Indian Country to the detriment of one tribe?" Binney said.
| May 21, 2007
| March 28, 2007
| August 30, 2006
Sovereign Immunity Court Decision:Vann v. Kempthorne
Cherokee Nation Judicial Appeals Tribunal Decision in Freedmen
v. Cherokee Nation
(March 7, 2006)
Related Stories:Cherokee tribes denounce Freedmen legislation
(4/10) Cherokee chief to address
Freedmen at conference
lawmakers press Senate on Freedmen
(4/4) Cherokee Freedmen dispute up for hearing
Opinion: Being Cherokee more than the
(3/26)Lawmakers press Artman on
(3/19) Freedmen protest
outside of Rep. Boren's office
(3/3)Black lawmakers to meet with Artman over Freedmen