FROM THE ARCHIVE
LETTER: Casino bridge is not deal
Facebook Twitter Email
NOVEMBER 27, 2000

"I am writing in hopes that Stephen Barrett's Nov. 21 letter to The Day does not stand as the only response from a Preston resident to the proposed Preston bypass. There is no reason for this proposal other than to support the Mashantucket Pequots..."

Get the Story:
DOT's proposed bypass and bridge benefits only the casinos (Edwin C. Guffy. Letter to the Editor. The New London Day 11/27)

Related Stories:
Town doesn't want casino bypass (Enviro 11/21)
Mohegan Tribe concerned about bridge (Money Matters 11/09)
Bridge proposed by state (Money Matters 11/7)

Stay Connected
Contact
Search
Most Read
News Archive
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000

About This Page

You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.

All stories are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)