Tribal foes say Indians can't own land
Facebook Twitter Email

State lawmakers in Connecticut have introduced a bill that will terminate Indian ownership rights they say never existed.

The bill will modify a state statue to say that any Indian who was resided on a particular piece of land during the state's Colonial era was merely a "tenant at will." Currently, the statute recognizes fee simple ownership, which would include state recognized tribes.

The bill is based on a document which allegedly states that Indians could not own land. The document was reported to have been discovered by James Lynch, a historian whose research on the Eastern Pequot Tribe and the Paucatuck Eastern Pequot Tribe was described by a top Bureau of Indian Affairs researcher as inadequate.

Current state statutes also recognize Indian ownership to state reservations. The state assumes a trust guardianship, although Attorney General Richard Blumenthal claims it is unlike the federal trust relationship.

Get the Story:
Pomfret representative to red-flag Indian land claims (The Norwich Bulletin 2/15)

Relevant Links:
General Statutes of Connecticut, Indians -
Attorney General, Connecticut -

Related Stories:
State recognition doesn't matter, says Conn. (8/10)
State: Pequot Tribes aren't real (8/3)

Stay Connected
Trending in News
News Archive
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000

About This Page

You are enjoying stories from the Indianz.Com Archive, a collection dating back to 2000. Some outgoing links may no longer work due to age.

All stories are available for publishing via Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)