Indianz.Com. In Print.
URL: http://www.indianz.com/News/archives/000532.asp
Bill's tribal jurisdiction provisions contested
Thursday, July 31, 2003
The chief backer of a bill that would beef up Indian Country's homeland
security efforts said on Wednesday he was "encouraged" despite seeing
opposition to a controversial provision that affirms tribal
sovereignty.
Blasting what he called "inflammatory rhetoric," Sen. Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii)
defended his proposal at a Senate Indian Affairs Committee hearing.
Critics, he said, were making outlandish claims that equate Native
Americans to terrorists.
"I would remind one and all that in all the military actions
in which this nation has been engaged in," he told the crowded room,
"more Native people of the United State
on a per capita basis have gone to serve in the armed forces
of our nation and placed themselves in harm's way than an other group of Americans."
"So to suggest that tribal governments are terrorists, or that citizens
of this country are subject to attack by Native people
is to make one of the most outrageous assertions I've ever
heard," he added.
Inouye was referring to the Citizens Equal Rights Alliance, a national
group whose members have spoken out against the bill. In letters
to the committee and in news publications, CERA contends it
will unlawfully expand tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians.
Inouye and other tribal leaders disputed the characterization,
saying that S.578, amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002,
strengthens law enforcement on reservations.
They are arguing that the bill only authorizes tribes to arrest
and detain those who commit terrorist attacks. The federal government,
they add, will retain ultimate authority to prosecute and try
criminals.
"If they read the legislation, it's pretty straightforward -- it's limited to [acts]
of terrorism," said National Congress of
American Indians (NCAI) President Tex Hall. "I think radicals
are jumping to conclusions."
But a U.S. Attorney from Minnesota with Indian law experience said
the provision will overturn the Supreme Court's Oliphant v. Suquamish
Tribe decision, which held that tribal courts lack
criminal jurisdiction over non-Indians.
Thomas B. Heffelfinger, a Bush appointee, said
the Department of Justice is opposed to the language as it
currently stands.
"Overruling Oliphant in a broad and isolated manner
could result in complicated legal and practical law enforcement issues
such as those of due process concerns, double jeopardy, resources
and appellate rights," he told the committee.
Heffelfinger, who heads a DOJ subcommittee on Indian
Country issues, said government attorneys have developed
a working group to address the 1978 Oliphant decision.
He said it is possible to improve reservation law enforcement
without expanding tribal court jurisdiction over non-Indians.
Nevertheless, the Bush administration supports the inclusion of
tribal governments in homeland security planning, he testified.
There are "potential terrorist targets" on the 54 million acres
of Indian law that need protection, he said.
The language on jurisdiction is just a small part of the
entire package, which seeks to treat tribes as sovereigns
under the Department of Homeland Security.
When Congress passed the bill creating the agency, tribes
were defined as local governments, forcing them to compete
with counties and municipalities for terrorism funding.
Section 13, however, is the most substantive and reads:
"For the purpose of this Act,
Congress affirms and declares that the inherent sovereign authority of an Indian
tribal government includes the authority to enforce and adjudicate violations of
applicable criminal, civil, and regulatory laws committed by any person on land
under the jurisdiction of the Indian tribal government," except where
limited by treaty and existing law.
The rest of the bill is mostly technical corrections to the 2002
act, adding tribes where necessary to ensure equitable treatment
with states.
Inouye said he will work with the administration and tribes to
make improvements to the bill.
Get the Bill:
Tribal
Government Amendments to the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (S.578)
Relevant Documents:
Witness
List (July 30, 2003)
Relevant Links:
Citizens Equal Rights Alliance -
http://www.citizensalliance.org
Department of Homeland Security - http://www.dhs.gov
National
Native Law Enforcement Association - http://www.nnalea.orgRelated Stories:
Tribes air homeland security concerns
(7/31)
DOJ's Supreme
Court brief backs sovereignty (7/30)
Tribal jurisdiction faces test before
Supreme Court (07/03)
Homeland security push leaves
tribes behind (05/12)
Inouye ties sovereignty to homeland
security (2/25)
Tribes
told to explore health funding options (02/05)
Thompson releases new IHS budget
(2/4)
In address, Hall
invokes the seven generations (02/03)
Copyright © 2000-2003 Indianz.Com