The Indian Health Service
might end up owing at least $2.7 million as part of a self-determination case in Alaska.
Arctic Slope Native Association manages the Samuel Simmonds Memorial
under a self-determination agreement with IHS.
The organization claims it's owed $2.7 million in unpaid contract support costs for fiscal years 1999 and 2000.
In December 2010, the Federal Circuit Court of
ruled that IHS didn't have to cover the shortfall.
But the U.S. Supreme Court
vacated that decision and ordered new proceedings in light of Salazar v.
Ramah Navajo Chapter
"[W]hen an agency makes competing contractual commitments with legally available funds and then fails to pay, it is the government that must bear the fiscal consequences, not the contractor," Justice Sonia Sotomayor
wrote for the court in the Ramah decision.
Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act
authorizes federal agencies to enter into
contracts with tribes and Alaska Native entities to manage federal programs. The
law requires the government to pay for the cost of the programs, plus additional
"contract support costs."
Congress, however, has failed to provide enough appropriations to cover the contract support costs. That doesn't excuse the executive branch, the Supreme Court said in Ramah.
Get the Story:
Uncle Sam Owes Yet More Money to Tribes
(Courthouse News Service 6/25)
Supreme Court Decision:Salazar
v. Ramah Navajo Chapter
(June 18, 2012)
Federal Circuit Decision:Arctic
Slope Native Association
(December 15, 2010)
Related Stories:Supreme Court orders new ruling for contract
support cost case
(6/25)Long battle expected
over self-determination contract support
(6/22)Trial to begin in dispute over self-determination
(6/20) Supreme Court
backs tribes in self-determination contract case
(6/18) Lloyd Miller: Supreme Court to rule in
(06/06) SCOTUSBlog: Recap of argument in self-determination
(04/19) Turtle Talk: Commentary on
(4/19) Supreme Court transcript from self-determination
(4/18) Supreme Court set for
hearing in self-determination case
(4/16) Supreme Court agrees to take up self-determination
(01/09) Supreme Court puts off
action on self-determination litigation
(11/28) 10th Circuit sides with tribes on
Join the Conversation