indianz.com your internet resource indianz.com on facebook indianz.com on twitter indianz.com on Google+ indianz.com on soundcloud
phone: 202 630 8439
Kill The Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement
Advertise on Indianz.Com
Home > News > Headlines
Print   Subscribe
Supreme Court takes up tribal jurisdiction case
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
Filed Under: Law

The following commentary was written by Gavin Clarkson (Choctaw), an assistant professor at the University of Michigan. He attended yesterday's oral arguments on behalf of Indianz.Com.

As I walked into the U.S. Supreme Court chambers for the oral argument of Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land & Cattle Company, I was filled with a sense of foreboding. The last time I attended oral argument was in 2001 for Nevada v. Hicks. After that awful experience, I was not hopeful that this time would be different.

Given the clear facts in this case and a string of victories for tribal court jurisdiction in four lower court proceedings, many in the Indian law community feared that the only reason the justices took the case was to wreak havoc upon tribal court jurisdiction.

So I was immediately surprised when the justices unleashed a barrage of tough questions for Paul A. Banker, the aptly named attorney for Plains Commerce Bank of South Dakota. He seemed unprepared for the onslaught and was backed into a corner on several occasions.

As one example, Banker suggested a tribe could impose a tax on a non-Indian at a tribal gas station. But he said the tribe could not enforce the tax in tribal court -- even under Montana v. US, which sets out two exceptions in which a tribal can exercise civil jurisdiction over non-Indians -- without explicit consent by the non-Indian.

"The question really is how far does that ability go and how far does it stretch. I don't think that it stretches to adjudication," Banker said of tribal court authority.

Among the Supreme Court, Justice Antonin Scalia has been quite hostile towards tribal courts. So it was equally surprising when Scalia got Banker to admit that his client could have avoided the dispute by inserting a clause in its loan documentation to require resolution in the state court system.

"In the absence of that, why should we bend over backwards to give something that has the smell of dealing with the Indians any other name?" Scalia asked.

Plains Commerce extended loans to Ronnie and Lila Long, members of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe of South Dakota who ran a cattle operation on the reservation. The Bureau of Indian Affairs guaranteed the loans through a federal program created by Congress.

In contrast to Banker, David C. Frederick and Curtis Gannon, attorneys for the Longs and the United States respectively, seemed far better prepared. The highlight of the morning came in response to a pointed question from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg regarding the lack of state or federal court review of tribal court decisions.

Frederick, a Washington, D.C., attorney, argued that while such decisions are not subject to state or federal court review, off-reservation enforcement is a function of comity, which means that a state or federal court would only enforce a tribal court judgment that was fair.

"It's not full faith and credit; it's comity," Fredericks said of the standard followed in South Dakota. "And that comity provides for a substantive review while enforcing the judgment."

And while Plains Commerce Bank asked the court to eviscerate tribal jurisdiction by eliminating the Montana exceptions altogether absent explicit consent, both Frederick and Gannon, of the Department of Justice, avoided overreaching. They instead presented the case as a straightforward one in which the first Montana exception -- relating to "nonmembers who enter consensual relationships with the tribe or its members, through commercial dealing, contracts, leases, or other arrangements" -- should apply.

"This court's Montana framework confirms that Indian tribes can, in some circumstances, exercise legitimate authority over nonmembers and nonmember land on their reservations," Gannon said.

Through their joint Tribal Supreme Court Project, the National Congress of American Indians and the Native American Rights Fund submitted an amicus brief in the case. NCAI general counsel John Dossett, who helped write the brief, seemed quite pleased with the direction of the oral arguments.

Tribes across the nation are also watching the case closely. Steve McSloy, who helped write an amicus brief on behalf of the Navajo Nation and tribal court organizations, commented that the argument went better than expected.

McSloy noted, however, that the court's "hypothetical about a bank making a home equity loan on a reservation just points out the justices' unfortunate lack of understanding of how things really work in Indian Country, where mortgages, much less home equity lines, are rare."

NARF attorney Richard Guest, who works on the Tribal Supreme Court Project, echoed my own sentiments, stating that he felt more hopeful after the argument than before. "But we've had that feeling before and been completely wrong," he cautioned.

Another Viewpoint:
First Impressions of the Plains Commerce Bank Oral Argument (Turtle Talk Blog 4/14)

Relevant Documents:
Oral Argument Transcript | Docket Sheet: No. 07-411 | Briefs on the Merits

Appeals Court Decision:
Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land and Cattle Company (June 26, 2007)

Lower Court Decision:
Plains Commerce Bank v. Long Family Land and Cattle Company (July 18, 2006)

Related Decision:
Smith v. Salish Kootenai College (January 10, 2006)

Related Stories:
Supreme Court to hear jurisdiction case (4/14)
DOJ to join argument in tribal court jurisdiction case (4/3)
Bush brief backs tribal court jurisdiction (3/24)
Opinion: No tribal jurisdiction over non-Indians (3/3)
Supreme Court agrees to hear tribal jurisdiction case (1/8)
Appeals court upholds tribal verdict in bank loan case (6/28)
9th Circuit vacates tribal jurisdiction ruling (2/2)
Court subjects non-Indian bank to tribal laws (7/20)
Appeals court upholds tribal jurisdiction after rehearing (01/11)

Copyright © Indianz.Com
More headlines...
Stay Connected:
On Facebook

On Twitter

On Google+

On SoundCloud
Local Links:
Federal Register | Indian Gaming | Jobs & Notices | In The Hoop | Message Board
Latest News:
President Trump confirms Indian Country's fears with budget request (5/23)
Office of Special Trustee pitches lower budget as 'taxpayer' savings (5/23)
Steven Newcomb: Monuments to white supremacy harm our people (5/23)
Two more spills of oil from Dakota Access Pipeline in North Dakota (5/23)
Native woman in skirt and sandals wins ultramarathon in Mexico (5/23)
Brothers from Huichol Tribe murdered as drug war rages in Mexico (5/23)
Iowa Tribe misses deadline again to launch internet poker project (5/23)
Mississippi Choctaw citizens request vote on $25M casino project (5/23)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe must wait to restart work on casino (5/23)
Documents show few meetings between Secretary Zinke and tribes (5/22)
Landowners on 2 reservations in Nebraska receive buy-back offers (5/22)
Human Rights Complaint: 'We are only letting the white people in' (5/22)
Mark Trahant: Funds for Indian health in danger under Republicans (5/22)
Cronkite News: Navajo Nation school works hard to teach language (5/22)
Harlan McKosato: DNA tests can't reveal your unique tribal history (5/22)
Gyasi Ross: Fired FBI director made sure Peltier remained in prison (5/22)
Tiffany Midge: A response to winning the cultural appropriation prize (5/22)
André Cramblit: Treasure your aunties and uncles for their histories (5/22)
Treaty tribes celebrate after court refuses to rehear salmon dispute (5/22)
Eastern Cherokee leaders open impeachment hearing against chief (5/22)
Top Interior nominee contradicts Trump on 'race' and tribal programs (5/19)
Arne Vainio: Expressing gratitude for the people we have around us (5/19)
Lawmakers dug deep to help North Dakota with #NoDAPL response (5/19)
Quapaw Tribe secures EPA grant for cleanup of contaminated lands (5/19)
Steven Newcomb: The racist and toxic roots of federal Indian policy (5/19)
Indian Country braces for worst with Trump's planned budget cuts (5/18)
Bipartisan task force announced to look into Indian Health Service (5/18)
Lawmakers push to renew Special Diabetes Program for Indians (5/18)
Albert Bender: Police slaughter of Native people rages unabated (5/18)
Steve Russell: There's a downside to impeaching Donald Trump (5/18)
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe cannabis consultant goes on trial (5/18)
Lower Brule Sioux Tribe repays money to address federal audit (5/18)
House passes bill to extend federal recognition to Virginia tribes (5/18)
Kalispel Tribe using bottled water at casino after contamination (5/18)
Leech Lake Band wins approval to build new casino at new site (5/18)
Tohono O'odham Nation secures victory in long-running dispute (5/17)
Dakota Access seeks to intervene in Oglala Sioux Tribe's lawsuit (5/17)
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs approves 3 bills at meeting (5/17)
Indian Health Service and 'high risk' tribal programs on agenda (5/17)
Bureau of Indian Affairs designates service area for Tejon Tribe (5/17)
Ruth Hopkins: Taxpayers footing $15M bill for DAPL private army (5/17)
more headlines...

Home | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell Lawsuit | Education | Environment | Federal Recognition | Federal Register | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Indian Trust | Jack Abramoff Scandal | Jobs & Notices | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Sports | Technology | World

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.