indianz.com your internet resource indianz.com on facebook indianz.com on twitter indianz.com on Google+ indianz.com on soundcloud
phone: 202 630 8439
Fredericks Peebles & Morgan LLP
Advertise on Indianz.Com
Home > News > Headlines
Print   Subscribe
Scalia's ruling in Native religious case debated
Friday, October 20, 2006

In a rare debate in the nation's capitol, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia explained why he ruled against the religious rights of Native Americans.

Scalia wrote the majority opinion in Employment Division v. Smith, a case decided in 1990. The decision allowed the state of Oregon to deny unemployment compensation to two Native Americans who were fired for failing a drug test after using peyote.

"Two defendants in the case were drug counselors and it was discovered that they were going off in the mountains every week to smoke peyote," Scalia recalled on Sunday during a debate with the president of the American Civil Liberties Union.

The closely-divided case prompted an outcry among tribal leaders and the religious community at large. It led Congress to pass the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to ensure members of the Native American Church could use peyote -- a hallucinogenic -- as a sacrament without punishment.

"My view is that your opinion in the Smith case gutted the free exercise of religion," ACLU President Nadine Strossen told the justice during the debate.

But to Scalia, the case wasn't really about religion. Court precedents, at the time, gave citizens overly broad license to challenge any statute by arguing that it burdens their religious beliefs, he said.

"The prior law that had been adopted [by the Supreme Court] was that when any general law impinges on a person's religious beliefs, the state has to demonstrate a compelling state interest," Scalia said.

That kind of thinking goes against the U.S. Constitution, Scalia said. So his majority opinion limited the ability of citizens to challenge general laws on religious grounds.

"If you want to get an exemption from a general law because of your religious beliefs, you have to ask the majority to give you that exemption, which in this country will easily be done," Scalia said in defense of the ruling. "We are a tolerant people, especially on matters of religion."

Scalia's reasoning fits in line with characterizations of him as a conservative judge who believes the publi not the courts, should decide matters like abortion rights or same-sex marriage. Scalia was appointed to the bench by the late president Ronald Reagan, a Republican.

But he disputed the notion that he is a "strict constructionist," a term applied to judges who base decisions on the actual words and phrases used in law rather than looking to other sources. "Some people call me that," he said. "I'm not that. You should interpret the Constitution reasonably."

Regardless of the characterizations, Scalia almost always comes down against tribal interests in Indian law cases. The highly charged language he sometimes uses has drawn particular criticism in Indian Country.

"State sovereignty does not end at a reservation's border," he wrote in a 2001 decision.

During oral arguments for a case in 2003, he said "I had thought that we -- that our cases make very clear that [tribal] sovereignty is a peculiar and lesser kind of sovereignty."

Scalia has had less of an impact on tribal matters due to the fewer number of Indian law cases accepted by the Supreme Court. Only one case in the last two years has brought defeat to Indian interests.

But the recent changes on the court have some in Indian Country concerned about future cases. The death of former Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist and the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor has brought two unknowns to the bench.

"We don't know right now where the majority of the court is," said Kevin Gover, the former head of the Bureau of Indian Affairs, at the recent National Congress of American Indians annual conference.

Scalia himself warned that shifts in the court could result in significant changes in the law. "Someday, you're going to get a very conservative Supreme Court and you're going to regret what you've done," he told the ACLU president during the debate.

Watch Debate:
Justice Scalia and ACLU (October 15, 2006)

Employment Division v. Smith:
Case Resources | Court Opinion

Related Stories:
Jurisdiction cases rejected by Supreme Court (10/11)
Supreme Court won't hear land-into-trust cases (10/03)
High court prepares for upcoming term (9/27)
U.S. Supreme Court to post same-day transcripts (09/15)
U.S. Supreme Court rejects another tribal land claim (06/06)
U.S. Supreme Court refuses to clarify tribal claims (05/16)
Supreme Court won't hear Cayuga land claim (5/15)
U.S. Supreme Court weighs Cayuga land claim (5/9)
U.S. Supreme Court won't hear Indian child welfare case (05/02)
Trust relationship not convincing to Supreme Court (02/22)
DOJ asks Supreme Court to hear Cayuga land claim (01/18)
Supreme Court won't rule on Indian law cases (01/10)
Indian law cases await U.S. Supreme Court action (12/08)
Supreme Court upholds state tax on reservation fuel (12/7)
U.S. Supreme Court weighs tribal-state tax case (10/04)
Supreme Court takes on tribal-state battle (10/4)
Roberts confirmed and sworn in as chief justice (9/30)
Bush said to be near new pick for Supreme Court (9/29)
Senate committee approves Roberts by 13-5 vote (9/23)
Sen. Leahy announces vote for Roberts confirmation (9/22)
Sen. Reid to vote against Roberts nomination (9/21)
Roberts mentions Indian law work on final day (9/19)
Supreme Court nominee Roberts promises 'no agenda' (9/13)
Roberts set for Supreme Court confirmation hearings (9/12)
Native Hawaiian work an issue for Roberts (9/7)
Roberts tapped for chief justice position (9/6)
Roberts aided O'Connor in confirmation process (08/11)
Rehnquist makes brief visit to hospital for fever (08/05)
Confirmation hearings on Roberts to start Sept. 6 (8/1)
Opinion: What does Roberts think about Seminole? (7/27)
Reagan-era documents from Roberts released (7/27)
White House plans to release most Roberts papers (7/26)
NARF lawyer fears Roberts will lean conservative (07/21)
Bush names John G. Roberts to Supreme Court (7/20)
Schumer asked about Roberts' views on Natives (7/20)
Rehnquist slaps down retirement rumors (7/15)
NCAI's Hall on picking a Supreme Court justice (7/13)
Mark Trahant: Appoint Indian to U.S. Supreme Court (7/11)
Key Republican speculates on Supreme Court makeup (7/11)
Harjo: O'Connor trampled on Native religious rights (7/8)
Republicans prepare for Rehnquist resignation (7/8)
O'Connor resigns from nation's highest court (7/5)
Justice's tenure filled with key Indian law cases (7/5)
Supreme Court wraps up October 2004 term (06/28)
U.S. Supreme Court vacancy impacts tribal rights (06/20)
High court won't take on Native Hawaiian recognition (06/14)
Appeals court to rehear tribal jurisdiction case (06/08)
Tribal authority over all Indians still unsettled question (06/23)
Myers not included in compromise on Bush judges (05/24)
Tribal sovereignty must be respected, court rules (05/13)
Supreme Court Roundup: Indian law cases rejected (04/19)
Supreme Court refuses Bush appeal of trust case (04/19)
Supreme Court takes drug case tied to peyote use (04/19)
Indian lawyer cites 'hostile' atmosphere in Washington (04/15)
Contracts still an issue despite Supreme Court win (04/14)
Oneida Nation begins land-into-trust process (04/13)
Supreme Court to weigh appeal of trust lawsuit (04/07)
Supreme Court Roundup: Indian law cases rejected (04/19)
Appeals court revives Wind River royalty fraud case (04/07)
BIA official calls high court ruling 'quite depressing' (03/31)
Supreme Court overturns Oneida Nation case (03/30)
Tribes win decision in contract support cost case (03/02)
Supreme Court takes on tribal-state tax dispute (03/01)
Passage of time at issue in Oneida Nation case (01/12)
Supreme Court rejects two Indian law cases (1/12)
U.S. Supreme Court decides cases without Rehnquist (12/14)
U.S. Supreme Court asked to rule on state taxation (12/02)
Peabody takes coal lease dispute to high court (12/01)
Tribal contracts pose conflict for U.S. Supreme Court (11/10)
Court to hear self-determination contract case (11/9)
Supreme Court takes action on Indian law cases (11/02)
Mille Lacs diminishment case before Supreme Court (10/22)
South Dakota challenge to tribes rejected by high court (10/19)
Supreme Court Roundup: 2003-2004 Term (07/08)
Supreme Court affirms tribal powers over all Indians (04/20)
Scalia sides with tribe but view carries no weight (03/24)
Supreme Court to resolve self-determination dispute (03/23)
Cantwell stresses importance of judicial picks (6/17)
Tribal fears in Supreme Court case go unrealized (5/20)
Supreme Court case too close to call for some (4/1)
Supreme Court tussles with tribal sovereignty case (4/1)
Supreme Court case pits tribes against states (3/31)
Supreme Court panel's predictions mostly came true (3/19)
Appeals court nominees draw fire (1/30)
Bush pick worked on Hicks case (1/30)
Venetie foe up for appeals court again (01/08)
Bush nominee familiar with Indian law (5/9)
Indian Law and the Supreme Court (12/11)



Copyright © 2000-2006 Indianz.Com
More headlines...
Stay Connected:
On Facebook

On Twitter

On Google+

On SoundCloud
Local Links:
Federal Register | Indian Gaming | Jobs & Notices | In The Hoop | Message Board
Latest News:
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs considers new round of bills (3/27)
Tim Giago: There's a smell of treason in the air in nation's capital (3/27)
Mark Trahant: The fight ahead for the future of Indian health care (3/27)
Bill John Baker: Woman play important roles in Cherokee Nation (3/27)
Brian Lightfoot Brown: One last victory for the Narragansett Tribe (3/27)
Native Sun News Today: Oglala Sioux Tribe questions loss of funds (3/27)
James Giago Davies: Troubled times are coming to Lakota country (3/27)
Sarah Van Gelder: Huge bank divests from Dakota Access Pipeline (3/27)
Cronkite News: Navajo Nation hails decision on aging power plant (3/27)
Tiffany Midge: There's a happy ending for Standing Rock out there (3/27)
Steven Newcomb: Getting to the true meaning of our sovereignty (3/27)
Steve Russell: Losing our status as 'domestic dependent nations' (3/27)
Mona Evans: Creek Nation fails to support Indian Child Welfare Act (3/27)
Tribes mount another fight after Trump approves another pipeline (3/24)
Native Sun News Today: Navajo elders continue long fight on land (3/24)
Editorial: Just another day of trying to keep up with the Trumps (3/24)
Elizabeth LaPensée: Video games encourage indigenous culture (3/24)
Mary Annette Pember: Native women work with youth offenders (3/24)
Tiffany Midge: Trump continues to conjure hero Andrew Jackson (3/24)
John Kane: Seneca Nation money train coming to end in New York (3/24)
Grand Ronde Tribes secure approval of school mascot agreement (3/24)
Editorial: Federal recognition for tribes in Virginia is long overdue (3/24)
Seneca Nation ends casino payments after sending $1.4B to state (3/24)
Appeals court hears slew of Indian cases amid focus on nominee (3/23)
Internal tribal disputes continue to trip up federal court system (3/23)
Mark Trahant: Indian health care gains ignored in political debate (3/23)
Native Sun News Today: Young fighters maintain Lakota tradition (3/23)
Ivan Star Comes Out: America loses its self-respect and humanity (3/23)
Rosalyn LaPier: Why water remains sacred to indigenous peoples (3/23)
Winona LaDuke: North Dakota spreads filth about water protectors (3/23)
Harold Monteau: Tribal governments are abusing their own people (3/23)
Alex Jacobs: Donald Trump in middle of the 'deep state civil war' (3/23)
Secretary Zinke announces 'doggy days' for Interior Department (3/23)
Keystone XL Pipeline route crosses Ponca Tribe's forced removal (3/23)
Indian lawmaker resigns after being charged for child prostitution (3/23)
Pinoleville Pomo Nation buys site of long-delayed casino project (3/23)
High court pick acknowledges poor treatment of 'sovereign' tribes (3/22)
Dakota Access submits another status update entirely under seal (3/22)
Court allows claim for alleged underpayment in Cobell settlement (3/22)
South Dakota tribes continue to extend Class III gaming compacts (3/22)
more headlines...

Home | Arts & Entertainment | Business | Canada | Cobell Lawsuit | Education | Environment | Federal Recognition | Federal Register | Forum | Health | Humor | Indian Gaming | Indian Trust | Jack Abramoff Scandal | Jobs & Notices | Law | National | News | Opinion | Politics | Sports | Technology | World

Indianz.Com Terms of Service | Indianz.Com Privacy Policy
About Indianz.Com | Advertise on Indianz.Com

Indianz.Com is a product of Noble Savage Media, LLC and Ho-Chunk, Inc.