House, Senate panels take up recognition bills
Thursday, June 22, 2006
A leading Republican clashed with Democrats on a measure to speed
up the federal recognition process at a House Resources Committee on Wednesday.
Rep. Richard Pombo (R-California), the chairman of the committee, initially
had the support of Democrats on the panel. His bill, H.R.512, would
force the Bureau of Indian Affairs to make decisions on tribal petitions that
have been pending for more than 20 years.
"There are few other areas of the executive branch in which action
occurs as slowly as in the BIA recognition process," Pombo
said at a markup session.
Rep. Nick Rahall (D-West Virginia), the committee's top
Democrat, Rep. Dale Kildee (D-Michigan), the co-chair of the Congressional
Native American Caucus, and other Democrats didn't dispute Pombo's conclusion.
But they said a substitute amendment being offered by Pombo would have thrown
the process into more disarray.
The Democrats said the amendment would unfairly impose
a deadline on the submission of new federal recognition petitions.
They said the six-month "sunset" provision would only create more bottlenecks by forcing
tribes to go to court or to Congress if they miss the deadline.
"I don't know where this substitute came from but I don't think it's the
solution that we've collectively advocated for and I just can't support
it," said Rep. Frank Pallone (D-New Jersey), summarizing the views
of Rahall, Kildee and others.
Pombo strongly defended his proposal and said his Democratic colleagues
misinterpreted its provisions.
Imposing a sunset on the submission of new petitions is necessary to
ensure some finality to the process and pressure the BIA into resolving its
backlog.
"You either know now or you don't meet the criteria," he said of potential
tribes who might not have submitted an application yet. "They have
six months to send in a letter after the enactment of this law," he added.
Pombo agreed with Democrats that the BIA needs more resources to
speed up its review process. But he said Congress should act now if it
ever expects to make progress.
"If we don't do this, if we don't force this issue, force BIA to recognize ... 30 years from
now, whoever replaces all of us is going to be dealing with the exact same issues," Pombo
said. "These bureaucrats have a perpetual job and as long as the don't make a decision,
they always have a job."
The dispute eventually prompted Pombo to withdraw his proposal.
"I won't offer the amendment. Is everyone OK now?" he said.
H.R.512 was then approved by a voice vote by the committee. Pombo said he
would work with Democrats on potential changes before the bill heads
to the House floor.
When it was established in 1978, the process of reviewing whether a tribal
group is entitled to a government-to-government relationship with the United
States was expected to take a couple of years.
But some tribes who filed petitions within the first 10 years are
still waiting for an answer.
The delays are traced to several causes, including the lack of resources and
adequate staff, cumbersome requirements and limited financial
resources of petitioning tribes. Some tribes have turned to gaming companies
in order to submit tens of thousands of pages to the BIA.
In one case, an investor reportedly spent $15 million on a Massachusetts
tribe that finally received a favorable answer after 31 years.
To address these types of cases, H.R.512 would require the BIA to
make decisions on tribes that submitted an application before 1988
and have fully documented their petition.
A tribe that meets those criteria would have the option of seeking
expedited review.
The BIA opposes the imposition of deadlines. At a federal recognition
hearing before the Senate Indian Affairs Committee yesterday, a senior
official said tribes should wait its turn before receiving
an answer.
The BIA also opposes legislative recognition.
Citing special circumstances, six Virginia tribes are seeking help from Congress
but the official, R. Lee Fleming of the Office of Federal Acknowledgment,
said the tribes should get in line just like other groups.
Sen. John McCain (R-Arizona), the chairman of the committee, agreed
that legislative recognition is not the best route to go.
But he said there are special cases in which it may be necessary.
Only on Indianz.Com:
Federal Recognition
Database V2.0 (May 2005)
Pombo Recognition Bill:
To require the prompt review by the Secretary of the Interior of the
longstanding petitions for Federal recognition of certain Indian
tribes, and for other purposes (H.R.512)
Virginia Recognition Bills:
Thomasina
E. Jordan Indian Tribes of Virginia Federal Recognition Act (H.R.3349)
Rappahannock Recognition Bill:
To
extend Federal recognition to the Rappahannock Tribe (H.R.5130)
Michigan Recognition Bill:
The
Grand River Band of Ottawa Indians of Michigan Referral Act (H.R.437)
Related Stories:
Virginia tribes press for recognition
measure (06/22)
Michigan tribe seeks boost in recognition
struggle (06/22)
House Resources Committee markup session
(06/21)
Response: Mashpees earned federal
recognition (06/16)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe to discuss
recognition (06/14)
Opinion: Mashpee Wampanoags paid for
recognition (06/08)
Opinion: Mashpee Wampanoags paid for
recognition (06/08)
Virginia tribes make case for recognition
bill (06/02)
Virginia tribes jockey for federal
recognition (05/26)
Sandy Lake Band of Ojibwe seeks recognition
(05/24)
Cowlitz Tribe rebuilds culture after
recognition (05/09)
Mashpee Wampanoags see support for
recognition (05/08)
BIA ruling on Schaghticoke recognition
criticized (04/11)
Bill introduced to recognize Rappahannock
Tribe (04/07)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe looks forward to
future (04/06)
Lobbying activities helped tribe bolster
recognition (04/04)
Backer spent $15M on Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe
(04/03)
BIA: Massachusetts tribe 'retained'
self-governance (04/03)
Massachusetts tribe eager for recognition
decision (03/31)
Tribal issues put Kempthorne in hot seat at
Interior (03/21)
McCain's agenda not always in sync with Indian
Country (03/10)
Pombo says Abramoff 'never lobbied me on
anything' (02/14)
Eastern Pequot Tribal Nation loses recognition
appeal (01/19)
Shinnecock Nation must wait for recognition
(01/09)
Mashpee lobbyists met with Dorgan several
times (12/05)
Shinnecock Nation an Indian tribe, federal judge
rules (11/08)
Lumbee chairman confident on federal
recognition (10/25)
BIA reverses course on state recognition of
tribes (10/13)
Pombo orders review of alleged fraud in
recognition bid (09/13)
Big workload looms for BIA on federal
recognition (07/26)
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation to submit more
evidence (07/14)
Editorial: Tribe has one
'last shot' at recognition (7/12)
BIA
wants Connecticut tribe to submit more evidence (7/7)
Republican lobbyists fighting for, against
tribes (06/28)
Schaghticoke tribe wants
to submit new evidence (6/27)
BIA ruling
on Connecticut tribes expected in September (06/15)
Olsen won't let Connecticut tribes submit
evidence (05/24)
BIA might not accept
new evidence from tribes (5/20)
Editorial: Reform of recognition process needed
(5/17)
BIA ordered to reconsider two
recognition cases (5/17)
Familiar
problems aired at recognition hearing (05/12)
Bill against tribe's recognition called
termination (04/29)
Federal recognition
a costly and risky affair (04/25)
Federal recognition hearing set by Sen. McCain
(4/22)
McCain to address federal
recognition concerns (04/22)
Recognition
handed to a 'not well informed' Cason (04/01)
Recognition bills surface yet again in Congress
(03/17)
Schaghticoke chief debates foe of
tribe's recognition (03/16)
Connecticut
tribe and main foe to discuss recognition (03/08)
Bill revokes BIA's recognition of Connecticut tribe
(3/7)
Tribe wants details of lobbying
firm's contacts (02/25)
Group denies
contact with DOI over tribe's recognition (02/18)
Lobbyist hired to overturn tribe's recognition
(01/24)
Schaghticoke Tribal Nation in
dispute with backer (01/20)
Lawmakers
ask Norton to block tribe's recognition (12/10)
BIA made error in tribe's recognition case
(12/9)
Group claims tribe's recognition
will hurt community (09/30)
State
officials want 'fix' to recognition process (09/09)
Probe finds no wrongdoing in BIA recognition
case (09/01)
Inspector General
investigation called 'bunch of b.s.' (09/01)
Schaghticoke recognition to go before review
board (06/04)
Critics take BIA to task
over federal recognition (05/06)
Recognition briefing paper at heart of latest
feud (05/05)
Martin attacked for federal
recognition decision (05/04)
Blumenthal
criticized for 'all-out war' on tribes (04/30)
Report: Martin bent rules to recognize Conn.
tribe (3/12)
Schaghticoke Tribal
Nation: 'Today is our day' (1/30)
Recognition decision expected for Schaghticoke
Tribe (1/26)
BIA asked to reconsider
tribe's membership roll (12/05)
Conn. AG wants to break court agreement with
BIA (11/12)
Tribe seeking
recognition purges membership rolls (10/13)
State recognized tribe allowed to sue in
Conn. (07/22)
Conn. court
upholds jurisdiction over tribe (05/13)
Schaghticoke chief disputes state
jurisdiction (01/17)
McCaleb 'throwing away a history
of people' (12/06)
Schaghticoke Tribe denied recognition
(12/5)
Lawmakers attempt to
thwart recognition (12/5)
Conn. tribe awaits recognition ruling
(12/4)
Recognition
decision expected this week (12/2)
McCaleb plans to issue
recognition ruling (11/26)
McCaleb ruling holds promise for
state tribes (06/25)
McCaleb makes recognition history
(6/25)
BIA project
consumes recognition resources (06/12)
BIA recognition staff fails
pressure test (05/31)
State
challenges Schaghticoke Tribe (04/19)
Tribe's recognition delayed
(02/20)
Conn. tribe waiting on
recognition (01/23)
Copyright © 2000-2006 Indianz.Com
Subscribe