EPA MURAL: "Dangers of the Mail" considered offensive by Indian employees.
A handful of government murals that depict Indian people in an unfavorable light will undergo a review to determine whether they are appropriate to display, a federal agency announced on Wednesday.
After years of complaints by Indian employees and their advocates, the General Services Administration initiated the review of six murals at the Environmental Protection Agency headquarters in Washington, D.C. The GSA plans to take input from the public under the
National Historic Preservation Act because the artwork is more than 70 years old.
"By utilizing this historic preservation review process, we will provide all interested parties an opportunity to inform GSA how they view this issue," Donald C. Williams, the GSA administrator for the Washington area.
Indian employees at EPA have already made their views known about the public display of the murals at the Ariol Rios Building. They say that depiction of Indian men scalping nude white women
and murdering white men are offensive. The paintings also show nude Indian men and women in submissive positions.
"The subliminal message of these is discouraging," Bob Smith, a member of the Oneida Tribe of Wisconsin who works at the building, said in an interview. "What they reinforce is stereotypes and I think that's wrong in a government building. It creates a hostile work environment for American Indians."
Elizabeth Kronk, a member of the Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa from Michigan, is a Washington attorney who has been advocating for the removal of the murals. She said they are an affront to Indian employees and to tribal leaders who visit the EPA building to meet with federal
"These murals perpetuate stereotypes of Native Americans as murderers, rapists and in positions of inferiority," she said. "To have to be faced with these depictions every day," she added,
The murals, located on two different floors, were installed in the 1930s when the building was the headquarters for the U.S. Postal Service. One in particular, "Dangers of the Mail," by Frank A. Mechau, has been controversial from the start because it displays nude women being attacked
The issue attracted the attention of former EPA administrator Carol Browner, who served during the Clinton administration. In 2000, she ordered the murals to be covered, saying they were offensive to American Indians and women.
But the covering was removed at the start of the Bush administration and some of the murals were sent out for restoration by the GSA. "By restoring the paintings, it made them brighter and more vivid to portray their negative stereotypes," asserted Smith.
Bush officials later put up an Indian-related display in front of two of the murals, including the "Dangers of the Mail" one. However, it is still possible to view the murals by walking behind the display.
To help gain more attention, Kronk submitted a resolution to the National Congress of American Indians to call for action on the murals. The resolution was passed at the NCAI annual session last October.
Kronk acknowledged there is some difficulty in resolving the matter because two of the murals are attached to the wall. The other four, however, are canvas paintings that have been easily removed in the past. "We would encourage [GSA] to do that again," said Kronk.
Physical removal of the two attached murals is an option, Kronk said, but covering them up completely could also be considered. "In essence they need to be removed from public display," she said. "Whether that's physical removal, we leave that to the agencies."
Whatever the solution, Smith wants it resolved quickly. "This has been really dragging on," he said yesterday. "Nobody's really taking a firm stand."
Smith pointed out that former U.S. attorney general John Ashcroft covered up a semi-nude statue at the Department of Justice headquarters. The government spent $8,000 on curtains to hide
the statue from public display.
"He was high level," Smith said of Ashcroft. "If the little man complained, they would have been ignored."
Smith has worked at the EPA for 15 years and has to pass the murals every day. He said it affects more than just himself and the 30 to 40 Indian employees at the headquarters.
"I wouldn't even bring my daughter here for Bring Your Daughter to Work Day," he said.
"How would I explain to my own kids the depiction of their own people as savages and sexual predators and murderers?"
The EPA did not return a request for comment yesterday. Nationwide, the agency has about 700 Indian employees.
View the Controversy:
American Indian Environmental Office, EPA -
Native American/American Indian Employment Program -
General Services Administration -