Columnist doesn't think the U.S. Supreme Court will be kind to Indian gaming after hearing Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community on Monday.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, an Indian gaming case, on Monday.
Columnist wonders why Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick (D), a supporter of gaming, is trying to stop the Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe from opening a casino.
Columnist discusses Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, an Indian gaming case that's being heard by the U.S. Supreme Court today:
Newspaper waits for Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe of Massachusetts to make the next move on plans for a casino.
The Poarch Band of Creek Indians operate the largest chunk of Class II electronic gaming machines in the United States.
Former state lawmaker girds for yet another debate over the expansion of gaming in Florida.
Writer says Menominee Nation off-reservation casino will benefit state of Wisconsin.
Columnist reports on the decision in Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Nash, which affects tribal court jurisdiction over casino claims.
State lawmaker wonders why Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) is taking so long to make a decision on the Menominee Nation off-reservation casino.
Columnist shares goings on at tribal casinos in New Mexico.
Writer says anti-gaming enforcement in Alabama has helped the Poarch Band of Creek Indians grow its casino empire.
Wisconsin state lawmaker says Menominee Nation off-reservation casino deserves approval:
Writer says Menominee Nation off-reservation casino won't actually create more jobs in Wisconsin.
Newspaper urges residents of Milford to vote in favor of the Foxwoods Massachusetts, the $1 billion casino being proposed by the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation of Connecticut.
Writer discusses the history behind the Seminole Tribe's casino in Tampa.
Opponent speaks about lawsuit over the $825 million casino just opened by the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria.
In recent months there has been much speculation as to what the Delaware Tribe’s intentions are with respect to our ever increasing presence in the state of Kansas, our treaty-promised forever home.
Newspaper says Class II facility proposed by Coquille Tribe deserves fuller debate in Oregon.
Writers discuss potential outcomes in Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, an Indian gaming case that will be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court on December 2.
Writer says voters in New York make the right call on a referendum to expand non-Indian gaming:
Writers say Connecticut should re-examine the future of gaming in light of the 25th anniversary of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
Attorneys Gabe Galanda and Ryan Dreveskracht call on the National Indian Gaming Commission to take action and avoid a potentially negative decision in Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community, a case before the U.S. Supreme Court.
Writers don't think the U.S. Supreme Court will rule in favor of tribal interests in Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community.
With the arrival of an $825 million casino from the Federated Indians of Graton Rancheria, newspaper fears even bigger tribal gaming facilities are on the way.
Attorney Dennis J. Whittlesey discusses the controversy surrounding the Menominee Nation off-reservation casino in Wisconsin.
Writer disputes claims behind a referendum [PDF: Proposal 1] to expand non-Indian gaming in New York.
Newspaper wonders whether the Poarch Band of Creek Indians will face legal troubles as the tribe's casino empire expands.
Tribal leaders in Minnesota oppose off-reservation casino in neighboring Wisconsin.
The Seminole Tribe of Florida has taken gaming and entertainment to a global scale with its Hard Rock brand.
Attorney Paul Moorehead reflects on 25 years of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
New York Times calls on voters to reject a referendum to expand non-Indian gaming.
Writer discusses one of the myths surrounding the $28 billion Indian gaming industry.
Newspaper reflects on controversial 2003 vote against a First Nations casino in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.
Newspaper says proposal for local casino will be affected by the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian Community.