Tribes in Minnesota should "seize" the opportunity to renegotiate their gaming compacts even as state Republicans threaten to approve non-Indian gaming, The Minneapolis Star Tribune says in an editorial.
The paper says a racino is a bad idea for the state. "Saying yes to racino means saying yes to Republican political friends at the expense of Indian casinos, and also to the exclusion of more lucrative options. It's a win-lose plan," the paper says.
But new compacts can be made to improve the "economic betterment of Indian people -- all of them," the paper says, referring to remote tribes that have not seen all the benefits of gaming. The compacts could allow more gaming and ensure tribal exclusivity in exchange for sharing revenues with the state, the paper says.
Get the Story:
Editorial: Gambling mania/Try for win-win with tribes
(The Minneapolis Star Tribune 3/21)
pwlat
Opinion
Editorial: Minn. tribes under state threat again
Monday, March 22, 2004 More from this date
Editorial: Minn. tribes under state threat again
Monday, March 22, 2004 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Opinion: Tribal casinos should give more to state States hope to keep gaming dollars at home
Indian Gaming Archive