"No matter the history, the Redskins should change their name because "redskin" is a mean nickname for Native Americans (also called Indians). Oh, I know the folks at Redskins Park say the team name is meant to honor Native Americans. But if that's true, why aren't Native Americans called "redskins" in the newspaper or on TV? And why isn't the Smithsonian's new National Museum of the American Indian called the National Museum of the Redskins?
The truth is that "redskins" points out one physical thing about Native Americans. It is never nice to make fun of people. Having a team named the Redskins is like calling a team the "Curly Hairs," the "Big Noses" or the "Freckleskins.""
Get the Story:
Fred Bowen: 'Redskins': Time for a Change
(The Washington Post 8/19)
pwpwd
Appeals Court Decision:
Pro-Football,
Inc. v. Harjo (July 15, 2005)
Lower Court Decision:
Pro-Football,
Inc. v. Harjo (September 30, 2003)
Patent and Trademark Office Ruling:
Trademark
Trial and Appeal Board (1999)
Relevant Links:
Redskins - http://www.redskins.com
Related Stories:
Opinion: It's time to bench the 'Redskins'
mascot (08/08)
TV stations
challenged on use of 'Redskins' name (7/22)
'Redskins' lawsuit revived by appeals court
(7/18)
Opinion: It's time for racist
mascots to go (07/14)
Seminole Tribe
doesn't have problem with mascots (07/05)
Harjo: Ruling expected any day on use of R-word
(06/17)
Harjo: NCAA should ban all 'Native'
imagery (05/27)
Appeals court enters
battle over 'Redskins' names (4/11)
Letter: Redskins owner should drop offensive
name (11/11)
Column: It's time for
'Redskins' to go (09/22)
Opinion:
Redskins should drop 'offensive' name (01/07)
Seneca Nation invited lawmakers to Redskins
game (10/13)
Opinion: Fight against
Redskins marks a waste of time (10/07)
NCAI critical of ruling on Redskins trademarks
(10/3)
Judge allows team to keep
Redskins names (10/2)
Court
considers cancellation of Redskins team marks (07/24)
Report: Redskins merchandise worth $5
million (07/24)
Judge to
hold hearing on Redskins mark case (7/21)
Opinion: Take Indians out of
Redskins (12/02)
On
Mascots: 'Redskins' is our n-word (09/16)
White Man: Indians proud of
Redskins (5/30)
Opinion:
Why Redskins must change (3/4)
Redskins get 'new' old look
(2/7)
Redskins uniforms
changed, for now (2/6)
Harjo:
Seeking 'honor' in R-word (2/4)
Opinion: Redskins is for
Indians (1/28)
Letters: More
on Redskins name (1/18)
Redskins name OK if it offends
(1/17)
As If: Replace
Redskins logo (1/15)
Editorial: Redskins honors Native
people (1/14)
Letters:
Debate over Redskins name (1/14)
Redskins name called 'dehumanizing'
(1/10)
Redskins told to
pick new name (1/9)
Letter:
'Redskins' honors Native people (1/9)
Opinion: War over Redskins plate
(1/7)
Redskins name
wanted changed (11/19)
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Stories
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
More Stories
Editorial: Celebrate real Indians, not mascots Wyandotte Chief: Taking control of our world
News Archive
2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000