URL: https://www.indianz.com/News/archives/001179.asp

Thursday, July 24, 2003

Merchandise for the Washington Redskins brings in an estimated $5 million a year, The Washington Post reports.

The Redskins has exclusive rights to use the team name and logo. If its trademarks are canceled, others could make their own merchandise, the team argues.

Pro-Football Inc. is the corporation that owns the Redskins. It claims it will suffer negatively if a federal judge throws out the federal registrations.

Get the Story:
Judge Nears Ruling in Redskins Name Fight (The Washington Post 7/24)
Redskins, American Indians in Court Fight (AP 7/24)

Today on Indianz.Com:
Redskins name dispute in federal court (7/24)

Recent Decision:
Pro Football Inc. v. Harjo (March 4, 2003)

Patent and Trademark Office Ruling:
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (1999)

Relevant Links:
Redskins - http://www.redskins.com

Related Stories:
Judge to hold hearing on Redskins mark case (7/21)
Opinion: Take Indians out of Redskins (12/02)
On Mascots: 'Redskins' is our n-word (09/16)
White Man: Indians proud of Redskins (5/30)
Opinion: Why Redskins must change (3/4)
Redskins get 'new' old look (2/7)
Redskins uniforms changed, for now (2/6)
Harjo: Seeking 'honor' in R-word (2/4)
Opinion: Redskins is for Indians (1/28)
Letters: More on Redskins name (1/18)
Redskins name OK if it offends (1/17)
As If: Replace Redskins logo (1/15)
Editorial: Redskins honors Native people (1/14)
Letters: Debate over Redskins name (1/14)
Redskins name called 'dehumanizing' (1/10)
Redskins told to pick new name (1/9)
Letter: 'Redskins' honors Native people (1/9)
Opinion: War over Redskins plate (1/7)
Redskins name wanted changed (11/19)

All stories in the Indianz.Com Archive are available for publishing under a Creative Commons License: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0)