"Debate about UND’s use of the Fighting Sioux nickname and logo has been going on for many years and not many minds have changed.

It’s time to reframe the argument.

Whatever your position on the issue, it must now be clear that continuing to use it is a threat to UND, Grand Forks and, indeed, the state.

This is easy enough to see in the short term. The sanctions that the NCAA has promised will cost UND events that draw people, and their money, to Grand Forks.

What do you suppose the impact is, in dollars, of a Minnesota hockey series here? And not just for the arena and the hockey program, but for hotels, bars and restaurants, gas stations and retail shops.

Yes, the Minnesota series helps make Grand Forks a destination city."

Get the Story:
Mike Jacobs: Let’s reframe the debate about UND’s nickname (The Grand Forks Herald 6/19)

Other Opinions:
John Johnson, Warren, Minn., column: Legislature’s arrogance threatens UND athletics (The Grand Forks Herald 6/19)
Paul Cline, Thatcher, Ariz., letter: Lawmakers’ willful blindness hurts UND (The Grand Forks Herald 6/17)

Related Stories:
Editorial: UND faces sanctions for use of 'Fighting Sioux' nick (6/14)
Steve Fool Bear: An Indian amid the 'Fighting Sioux' debate (6/13)
Opinion: Tribes gave permission to keep 'Fighting Sioux' (5/31)
Column: Respect tribe's support for 'Fighting Sioux' name (5/16)
Editorial: Taking responsibility for 'Fighting Sioux' nickname (5/10)
Editorial: NCAA not kidding with 'Fighting Sioux' nickname (4/21)
Editorial: 'Fighting Sioux' meeting should be open to the public (4/6)
Great Plains tribes pass resolution against use of Indian mascots (4/5)
Editorial: State can make case for saving the 'Fighting Sioux' (3/31)
Opponents of 'Fighting Sioux' name not ready to give up fight (3/23)
Opinion: New law to save 'Fighting Sioux' is unconstitutional (3/21)
Opinion: Tribes weren't included in 'Fighting Sioux' settlement (3/17)
North Dakota governor signs bill to keep 'Fighting Sioux' name (3/17)
Erich Longie: State going back on its word with 'Fighting Sioux' (3/16)
Opinion: There's nothing negative about using the word 'Sioux' (3/16)
Letter: Another broken promise with effort to save Fighting Sioux (3/14)
North Dakota governor will sign bill to save 'Fighting Sioux' name (3/11)
Indian lawmaker pushes for defeat of bill to save 'Fighting Sioux' (3/10)
North Dakota Senate committee votes against Fighting Sioux bill (3/9)
Opinion: Fighting Sioux name not an honor to Native Americans (3/7)
Letter: Tribes ignored as lawmakers fight to keep Fighting Sioux (3/7)
'The Indian and the White Guy' headed to North Dakota after all (3/4)
Comedy duo asked not to use 'Indian' during North Dakota show (3/3)
Opinion: 'Fighting Sioux' nickname an insult to Native Americans (3/2)
Letter: Standing Rock Sioux Tribe did not give up 'Sioux' name (2/23)
North Dakota House backs bill to save Fighting Sioux nickname (2/22)
UND University Senate opposes bills to revive 'Fighting Sioux' nick (2/8)
Michael Eshkibok: Fighting Sioux a symbol of America's racist past (1/26)
Erich Longie: Too many lies for too many years on Fighting Sioux (1/24)
Letter: Board and tribes hold too much power over Fighting Sioux (1/20)
Letter: Respect tribal decisions about 'Fighting Sioux' nickname (1/18)
Letter: Ask tribes in South Dakota about 'Fighting Sioux' nickname (1/17)
Letter: 'Fighting Sioux' supporters must work through their grief (1/13)
Editorial: Republicans wasting time trying to save 'Fighting Sioux' (1/12)
North Dakota Republicans aim to keep 'Fighting Sioux' nickname (1/11)