"There is no way any self-respecting tribal official or tribal member will give up our sovereignty for a college athletic team’s nickname. To American Indians, sovereignty is sacred.
In my view, tribal nations never will give up their sovereignty, even at gunpoint.
Here’s one reason why:
Proposals to force tribes into waivers of their sovereign immunity would put Indian tribal governments at risk. Tribal councils and tribal courts would be subject to immense lawsuits, whether they acted or failed to act.
No government could long operate under such a waiver of sovereign immunity.
By waiving our sovereign immunity for the nickname, all the gains we made in the past 50 years would be in jeopardy. Our tribal nations as they known today no longer would exist.
We no longer would be free from unwanted influence from state and city governments. Huge companies could set up businesses on our lands at will. Unscrupulous outsiders, who are not above paying tribal members to promote their cause, would be able influence our tribal government."
Get the Story:Erich Longie: Will tribes trade sovereignty for UND's nickname? (The Grand Forks Herald 10/6)
pwpwd Related Stories:
Column: Tribes in spotlight for 'Fighting Sioux' (10/5)
Another deadline set for 'Fighting Sioux' nick (10/2)
Letter: 'Fighting Sioux' affects Chippewa too (10/2)
Editorial: Waiting for tribe on 'Fighting Sioux' (10/2)
Deadline comes for 'Fighting Sioux' nickname (10/1)
Column: Time has spoken on 'Fighting Sioux' (10/1)
Rally against Fighting Sioux nickname at UND (9/30)
Fool Bear: Democracy at Standing Rock Sioux (9/28)
'Fighting Sioux' foes seek Spirit Lake reversal (9/25)
Spirit Lake Nation clarifies 'Fighting Sioux' stance (9/21)
Board asked to extend deadline on 'Sioux' nick (9/18)
Yellow Bird: It's time to retire 'Fighting Sioux' (9/17)
Spirit Lake Nation affirms 'Fighting Sioux' vote (9/17)
Editorial: Time to move on from 'Fighting Sioux' (9/14)
Deadline on 'Fighting Sioux' might be extended (9/11)
Media guide depicts UND 'Indian' being chased (9/9)
Letter: Follow tribal wishes on 'Fighting Sioux' (9/8)
Editorial: Extend deadline for 'Fighting Sioux' nick (9/4)
Time running out to keep 'Fighting Sioux' at UND (9/3)
Deadline approaching over 'Sioux' nickname (08/19)
Editorial: No happy ending for 'Sioux' nick (8/17)
Standing Rock Sioux leaders nix 'Sioux' vote (8/12)
Petition seeks another vote on 'Fighting Sioux' (07/17)
Letter: Keep fighting to keep 'Fighting Sioux' nick (7/16)
Opinion: Let Standing Rock vote on 'Sioux' nick (7/13)
Letter: Standing Rock Sioux vote on UND nickname (6/15)
Tribal 'Fighting Sioux' supporters seek action (06/05)
Letter: Tribal leaders ignore 'Fighting Sioux' views (5/26)
Editorial: Retiring 'Fighting Sioux' the right move (5/18)
Editorial: 'Fighting Sioux' can't survive much longer (5/15)
UND faces new deadline on 'Fighting Sioux' name (5/15)
Board meeting to discuss fate of 'Fighting Sioux' (5/14)
Column: Don't drop 'Sioux' before tribe votes (5/13)
Cartoon: Democracy and vote on 'Fighting Sioux' (5/11)
Erich Longie: 'Sioux' opponents won't give up fight (5/4)
Column: 'Fighting Sioux' vote sends strong message (4/28)
Opinion: 'Fighting Sioux' reflects warrior spirit (4/27)
Column: A perspective on 'Fighting Sioux' vote (4/24)
'Fighting Sioux' supporters eye Standing Rock vote (4/23)
Spirit Lake Nation reportedly backs 'Fighting Sioux' (4/22)