"Indian casino income should not be differentiated from treaty money. Casino money is still money that comes to Indians because we�re Indians. Casino money exists by virtue of historical Indian treaties. Why declassify casino money as something other than treaty money? Indian business income is no different from treaty income. Therefore casino money should be dispensed equitably to all Indians.
But not through the BIA. Though the BIA was designed to distribute goods and services to the different tribes according to their different needs, and to �manage� Indian land and money, the BIA has failed to do this wisely. Its record is dismal.
An Indian national bank can do better."
Get the Story:
An Indian National Bank?
(Front Page Magazine 7/13)
Relevant Links:
Bad Eagle - http://www.badeagle.com
Related Stories:
Bad Eagle: White woman in Indian dress OK with
me (06/22)
Yeagley: The right is
always right about Indians (04/28)
David Yeagley: Democrats do nothing for
Indians (03/26)
Opinion: Casinos
will destroy Indian Country (08/14)
Harjo: David Yeagley, Comanche or
Cracknut? (02/07)
Bad Eagle: Indian Country needs its own bank
Tuesday, July 13, 2004
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'