"As painful as it would have been, Gov. Mike Rounds and Attorney General Larry Long should have rejected any ideas of appealing a voting rights decision that favored Native Americans and simply set the Legislature to work redrawing district boundaries.
U.S. District Judge Karen Schreier ruled that when legislators redrew the state's 35 legislative districts to reflect the 2000 census, they "illegally diluted" Native Americans' rights with the boundaries of Districts 26 and 27, which include the Pine Ridge and Rosebud reservations.
Native Americans were disenfranchised. State officials just should have accepted that decision and worked to correct it."
Get the Story:
Editorial: Voting rights appeal delays justice
(The Sioux Falls Argus Leader 9/28)
Related Stories:
Appeal planned in South Dakota voting rights
case (09/17)
Judge: South Dakota violated
Indian voting rights (9/16)
Federal
judge to issue voting rights ruling this summer (05/04)
ACLU rests case in Indian voting rights
trial (04/23)
S.D. Indians testify of
racism in voting rights trial (04/15)
Trial into Indian voting rights in South Dakota
continues (4/14)
Trial examines Indian
voting rights in South Dakota (4/13)
Editorial: Don't appeal Indian voting rights case
Tuesday, September 28, 2004
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'