Narragansett Tribe questions push for gaming referendum

Thursday, May 26, 2011  

When the Narragansett Tribe of Rhode Island sought voter approval for a casino, lawmakers insisted on several concessions before putting the issue on the ballot.

But Chief Sachem Matthew Thomas questioned why lawmakers aren't making similar demands now that the owners of Twin River Casino are seeking to turn their slot machine facility into a full-fledged casino. Thomas said the biggest issue is a licensing fee.

“We were forced to commit to a $100 million licensing fee up-front," Thomas told the House Finance Committee, The Providence Journal reported.

“Even Massachusetts has asked for up to $250 million in up-front licensing fees,” Thomas added . “This legislation has $0 for a licensing fee ... Where’s the taxpayer protection? Is it a ‘work it out later’ deal?”

Twin River shares a portion of its revenues with the state. Of the state's share, a small percentage goes to the Narragansetts.

Get the Story:
Twin River pushes for gambling referendum (The Providence Journal 5/26)

Related Stories:
Slots facility questions involvement of Narragansett Tribe (5/18)
Editorial: Narragansett Tribe aims to cash in with casino bid (5/2)
Narragansett Tribe questions effort to expand slots facility (4/29)
Rhode Island includes Narragansett Tribe in study on gaming (3/18)
Caesar's Entertainment interested in Rhode Island casino option (3/4)
Narragansett Tribe pitches casino idea to Rhode Island governor (3/3)
Rhode Island governor backtracks on Narragansett gaming idea (3/2)
Narragansett Tribe wants to ask governor about new casino bid (3/1)
Rhode Island governor wants Narragansett Tribe in gaming talks (2/9)