Facebook Twitter Email
FRIDAY, JUNE 13, 2003

The New York Court of Appeals on Thursday invalidated a casino compact with the Akwesasne Mohawk Nation because it wasn't ratified by the State Legislature.

The 4-3 decision applies to a 1993 agreement then-Gov. Mario Cuomo signed for the tribe's on-reservation casino. It doesn't appear it would lead to the casino's closure or affect the tribe's deal for a Catskills casino.

The court didn't rule on the constitutionality of Indian gaming.

Get the Story:
Court says casino agreement invalid (The Syracuse Post-Standard 6/13)
Ruling affirms lawmakers' role in casino deals (The Albany Times Union 6/13)
Appeals court discredits Cuomo casino deal (Ottaway News Service 6/13)
Court Says Indian Casinos Require Legislative Approval (The New York Times 6/13)
Username: indianzcom, Password: indianzcom

Get the Decision:
Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce v. Pataki (June 12, 2003)

Related Stories:
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe schedules run-off (6/12)
Mohawk candidates want election held again (6/11)
Catskills weighs effects of Mohawk election (6/10)
Mohawk candidates critical of gaming deal elected (6/9)
Gaming an issue in Mohawk tribal election (6/6)
N.Y. court puts halt to tribal gaming deals (05/20)
DOJ disapproves of Mohawk land and gaming deal (5/15)
Mohawk tribe announces $100M deal with N.Y. (5/13)
Snag resolved in Mohawk land and gaming settlement (5/12)
Announcement of Mohawk land and gaming deal delayed (5/8)
N.Y. to finalize Mohawk land claim and gaming deal (5/7)
Mohawk chiefs accused of meddling (06/07)
Mohawk traditional chiefs affirmed (5/21)
Court strikes Mohawk gaming compact (5/3)
Mohawk members want own casino (4/4)
N.Y. court hears casino compact case (3/26)
BIA can't figure out court ruling (3/21)
Mohawk Tribe changing name (3/8)
Mohawk Tribe blasts 'Chief' editorial (3/5)
Inside the BIA, plenty of drama (3/4)
Ashcroft urged to charge BIA officials (3/1)
Mohawk deal could leave parties out (2/28)
Catskills land-into-trust filed (2/12)