Indianz.Com SoundCloud: 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Oral Arguments in Joseph Pakootas v. Teck Cominco Metals
In 2006, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the company must answer to a lawsuit filed by individual tribal members in 2004. The tribe itself and the state of Washington have since joined the case but it has not reached a conclusion amid continued opposition from Teck. A portion of the case in fact went before the 9th Circuit again last week. The company is trying to overturn yet another victory won by the tribe and its members. "The river is the natural resource and cultural lifeblood of the Colville Tribes and must be protected and restored," Boyd's statement read. The Environmental Protection Agency has conducted studies on the Upper Columbia River and results have shown that metal contaminants are present in the water and sediment, which affects tribal fishing rights. Some of it is visible in the so-called "black sand" beaches along a 150-mile stretch of the river between Canada and the Grand Coulee Dam.
Join the Conversation
Related Stories:Colville Tribes win decision in Columbia River pollution case (4/9)
Colville Tribes welcome denial of Superfund case (1/8)
Supreme Court won't hear Colville Superfund case (1/7)
Bush brief opposes review of Colville pollution case (11/26)
Supreme Court seeks DOJ views on Colville case (7/18)
9th Circuit won't rehear Colville pollution lawsuit (11/8)
9th Circuit allows tribal suit against mine company (07/05)
Report backs tribe in Columbia River pollution claim (03/08)
Diplomats discuss tribal spat with Canadian company (12/01)
Judge won't dismiss tribe's pollution lawsuit (11/09)
Canadian company fights tribe's lawsuit (11/5)
Mining company not worried about tribal-state lawsuit (09/02)
State joins tribal lawsuit against mining company (9/1)
Company seeks to dismiss tribal Superfund lawsuit (8/27)
Colville Tribes sue Canadian company over pollution (07/22)