Mishewal Wappo Tribe to appeal decision in recognition lawsuit


Photo of a Wappo woman from the Edward S. Curtis collection. Photo from Library of Congress / Digitization by Northwestern University Library

The Mishewal Wappo Tribe of California will continue to fight for federal recognition despite losing a major decision in court, Chairman Scott Gabaldon said.

The tribe was listed for termination under the California Rancheria Act of 1958. A lawsuit filed in 2009 claimed the Bureau of Indian Affairs did not carry out the process in a rightful manner.

Judge Edward J. Davila, however, determined that the tribe waited too long to go to court. A 19-page decision issued on Monday said the suit should have been filed no later than 1967.

“It’s just another bump on the road to the end result of getting our sovereignty,” Gabaldon told The Santa Rosa Press-Democrat in response to the ruling. “We are going to appeal this thing as far as we can go.”

The next step would be the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Get the Story:
Wappo tribe leader vows to fight ruling denying federal recognition (The Santa Rosa Press-Democrat 3/26)
Judge rules against Wappo tribal recognition lawsuit (The Napa Valley Register 3/25)
Federal court rules for Napa County, against Wappo tribe (The Vallejo Times-Herald 3/25)

Join the Conversation

Related Stories
Mishewal Wappo Tribe loses decision in federal recognition case (3/24)
Mishewal Wappo Tribe waits for decision in recognition lawsuit (02/26)
California county opposes changes to federal recognition rules (08/11)
Decision awaited on Mishewal Wappo Tribe federal recognition (06/10)
Editorial: County rises to counter threat of federal recognition (8/1)
Mishewal Wappo Tribe identifies backers of federal recognition (7/31)
Mishewal Wappo Tribe back in court in federal recognition suit (7/26)
Hearing scheduled in Mishewal Wappo Tribe's recognition case (07/08)
9th Circuit to hear appeal in Mishewal Wappo recognition case (6/3)
Lawmaker avoids speaking name of tribe seeking recognition (3/20)
County lobbies BIA against Mishewal Wappo Tribe recognition (11/16)
Opinion: Don't fight Mishewal Wappo Tribe's federal recognition (11/13)
Mishewal Wappo Tribe aims to regain federal status and land (10/30)
County seeks to rejoin Mishewal Wappo Tribe recognition case (10/17)
Opinion: Mishewal Wappo recognition will only lead to a casino (10/9)
Judge removes counties from Mishewal Wappo recognition suit (10/4)
Mishewal Wappo Tribe testifies at hearing on federal recognition (06/26)
Opinion: Mishewal Wappo Tribe does not qualify for recognition (05/29)
Mishewal Wappo Tribe's recognition backed by unknown group (5/24)
Letter: Appalling treatment of Mishewal Wappo Tribe recognition (5/21)
Editorial: Mishewal Wappo Tribe recognition a serious issue (5/3)
Tribe asks judge to remove counties from recognition case (02/22)
Judge blocks an appeal in Mishewal Wappo recognition case (2/3)
Counties trying to appeal Mishewal Wappo recognition case (01/18)
Counties want legal fees after losing Mishewal Wappo ruling (11/09)
Judge refuses to block Mishewal Wappo Tribe recognition (10/26)
Lawmakers oppose recognition for Mishewal Wappo Tribe (5/24)
Counties fight to remain in Mishewal Wappo Tribe's lawsuit (4/14)
DOJ wants two counties out of Mishewal Wappo Tribe's lawsuit (4/8)
Opinion: Recognition for Mishewal Wappo Tribe is devastating (3/18)
Editorial: County rightly worried about Mishewal Wappo casino (2/22)
County takes battle against Mishewal Wappo Tribe to Capitol Hill (2/10)
County settles federal recognition case with Mishewal Wappo Tribe (2/2)
City seeks to join lawsuit over Mishewal Wappo Tribe recognition (12/15)
Judge lets counties join Mishewal Wappo recognition lawsuit (6/15)
Judge delays hearing over Mishewal Wappo recognition (4/20)
County cites gaming fears in Mishewal Wappo lawsuit (3/9)
Judge delays hearing over Mishewal Wappo recognition (6/2)
Mishewal Wappo Tribe not thinking about casino for now (1/20)