Longtime NBC Sports anchor Bob Costas denounced the mascot of the Washington professional football team during a halftime commentary on Sunday.

Costas spoke as Washington played Dallas before an audience estimated to be in the tens of millions. He said the name can only be interpreted as a "slur" to Native people.

"Ask yourself what the equivalent would be if directed towards African Americans, Hispanics, Asians or any other ethnic group," Costas said. "When considered that way, 'Redskins' can’t possibly honor a heritage or noble character trait, nor can it possibly be considered a neutral term. It’s an insult, a slur, no matter how benign the present day intent."

The entire commentary appears below:

With Washington playing Dallas here tonight, it seems like an appropriate time to acknowledge the ongoing controversy about the name, “Redskins.” Let’s start here: there’s no reason to believe that owner Daniel Snyder, or any official or player from his team, harbors animus towards Native Americans, or chooses to disrespect them. This is undoubtedly also true of the vast majority of those who don’t think twice about the longstanding moniker. And in fact, as best could be determined, even a majority of Native Americans say they are not offended.

But, having stipulated that, there’s still a distinction to be made. Objections to names like Braves, Chiefs, Warriors and the like, strike many of us as political correctness run amuck. These nicknames honor, rather than demean. They’re pretty much the same as Vikings, Patriots, or even Cowboys. And names like Blackhawks, Seminoles and Chippewas, while potentially problematic, can still be okay provided the symbols are appropriately respectful. Which is where the Cleveland Indians, with the combination of their name and Chief Wahoo logo, have sometimes run into trouble.

A number of teams, mostly in the college ranks, have changed their names in response to objections. The Stanford Cardinal and the Dartmouth Big Green were each once the Indians. The St. Johns Redmen are now the Red Storm. And the Miami of Ohio Redskins, that’s right Redskins, are now the RedHawks. Still, the NFL franchise that represents the nation’s capital, has maintained its name.

But think for a moment about the term “Redskins,” and how it truly differs from all the others. Ask yourself what the equivalent would be if directed towards African Americans, Hispanics, Asians or any other ethnic group. When considered that way, “Redskins” can’t possibly honor a heritage or noble character trait, nor can it possibly be considered a neutral term. It’s an insult, a slur, no matter how benign the present day intent.

It’s fair to say that for a long time now, and certainly in 2013, no offense has been intended. But if you take a step back, isn’t it clear to see how offense might legitimately be taken?

Get the Story:
Bob Costas becomes latest to chime in on controversy surrounding team name (The Washington Post 10/14)
Goodell says Redskins owner Snyder ‘way down the road’ in consideration of name change (AP 10/13)

Also Today:
Robert McCartney: Web contest highlights 1,887 possible new logos for Washington’s pro football team (The Washington Post 10/12)

Related Stories:
Column: The real letter from Washington football team owner (10/11)
Change the Mascot spot features President Obama, Rep. Cole (10/11)
Activists call for ban on Washington team name in Minnesota (10/11)
Suzan Shown Harjo still leading battle against racist mascots (10/10)
Washington team owner defends racist name in letter to fans (10/10)
Opinion: Ray Halbritter not a legitimate Oneida Nation leader (10/10)
AP can't find opponents of racist mascots in Indian Country (10/9)
NFL commissioner again calls for Washington team to 'listen' (10/9)
Column: Changes afoot for Washington football team mascot (10/9)
Column: It's time to retire racist Washington football mascot (10/9)
Opinion: NFL players can show leadership on racist mascots (10/9)
NFL set to meet with Oneida Nation to discuss racist mascot (10/8)
Mike Wise: Never may come sooner for Washington mascot (10/8)
Opinion: Owner of Washington football team in deep trouble (10/8)
Blog: Here's how to get rid of Washington's football mascot (10/8)
President Obama weighs in on Washington mascot debate (10/7)