Opinion | Sports

Column: It's time to retire racist Washington football mascot





Washington Post columnist Kathleen Parker joins a growing crowd of voices at the paper in opposing the Washington professional football team's racist mascot:
There’s surely no insult intended by those cheering for the Redskins. Finally, haven’t we come far enough not to take everything so personally?

Spoken like a true paleface.

My more-considered response is that, yes, we should — under certain circumstances — relinquish beloved tradition to the mature moment. This seems to be the sentiment of President Obama, who recently said that if he were the team owner, he would consider changing the name.

Understandable as it is for fans to resist changing the name of their team, loyalty to a name isn’t really the point. The point is that “redskin,” unlike the Native American-related names of other teams, refers to a physical characteristic. It is implicitly racial and, through its usage, has been explicitly racist. We needn’t wander far into the maze of other offensive terms, many once considered humorous, that would be instantly unacceptable today.

Get the Story:
Kathleen Parker: Redskins’ name is ready for retiring (The Washington Post 10/9)

Some Letters:
Washington Redskins: Back to the scrimmage line on the team name (The Washington Post 10/9)
Discussion: Is the call getting louder for a Redskins’ name change? (The Washington Post 10/8)

Related Stories:
NFL set to meet with Oneida Nation to discuss racist mascot (10/8)
Mike Wise: Never may come sooner for Washington mascot (10/8)
Opinion: Owner of Washington football team in deep trouble (10/8)
Blog: Here's how to get rid of Washington's football mascot (10/8)
President Obama weighs in on Washington mascot debate (10/7)
Opinion: Broadcasters must take stand against racist mascot (10/4)
Oneida Nation to host symposium on racist NFL mascot in DC (10/3)

Join the Conversation