The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to hear the Mattaponi Tribe's treaty lawsuit against the state of Virginia.
The tribe cited a 1677 treaty with the British in hopes of blocking a large reservoir on ancestral lands. But the Virginia Supreme Court said the state properly issued a permit for the controversial project. The Supreme Court, without comment, declined to review that decision.
Other treaty issues against the city of Newport News could still be considered. A lower court ruled that the 1677 treaty is a matter of state, not federal, law.
The case is Mattaponi Indian Tribe, et al. v. Virginia, No. 05-1141.
Get the Story:
Court refuses reservoir case (AP 6/13)
Virginia Supreme Court Decision:
Alliance to save the Mattaponi Indian v. Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Environmental Quality (November 5, 2005)
Case Documents:
Mattaponi v. Virginia (Native American Rights Fund)
Related Stories:
Virginia's top court hears treaty rights
case (09/15)
Mattaponi Tribe appeals
treaty case to high court (10/06)
Treaty
rights referred to Virginia Supreme Court (09/03)
Judge: Treaty doesn't apply to permit process
(4/4)
Supreme Court rejects Virginia treaty rights case
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Trending in News
1 Tribes rush to respond to new coronavirus emergency created by Trump administration
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'
2 'At this rate the entire tribe will be extinct': Zuni Pueblo sees COVID-19 cases double as first death is confirmed
3 Arne Vainio: 'A great sickness has been visited upon us as human beings'
4 Arne Vainio: Zoongide'iwin is the Ojibwe word for courage
5 Cayuga Nation's division leads to a 'human rights catastrophe'