The tribes and some politicians view the Bridgeport proposal as a ruse, noting that the city was chosen because MGM has agreed not to pursue a casino anywhere near its Massachusetts site. But the firm has told business leaders it intends to seek state approval for the project, The Hartford Courant reported. The tribes, meanwhile, are suing the Trump administration for failing to take action on their revised gaming agreements. The Bureau of Indian Affairs received the documents on August 2 but failed to make a decision within 45 days, as required by the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, a complaint filed in federal court states. Exactly 45 days later, the BIA said it had "completed" review of the Class III gaming compacts in in a September 15 letter to the tribes. Yet a notice of that action has never been published in the Federal Register, the lawsuit alleges. Though the agreements do not approve the new East Windsor casino, top political officials at the Department of the Interior raised concerns about the connection to the development, according to correspondence sent by the tribes prior to the filing of the lawsuit. Read More on the Story:
Tribes Express Interest In A Bridgeport Casino (CT News Junkie December 7, 2017)
Tribes counter MGM, hinting at their bid for new casinos (The Connecticut Mirror December 6, 2017)
Tribes want to build Bridgeport casino: MGM: ‘We’ve got the best site’ (The Connecticut Post December 6, 2017)
Tribes Want Part Of Bridgeport Casino Plans (Bridgeport Patch December 6, 2017)
Mohegan Sun aims to expand CT reach with Bridgeport Arena deal (Hartford Business Journal December 6, 2017)
Casino expansion could be hot topic for lawmakers in 2018 (The New London Day December 6, 2017)
MGM, tribes open new fight over casino expansion in Connecticut (The Connecticut Mirror December 5, 2017)
MGM Resorts CEO Seeks Legislative Support For Bridgeport Casino (The Hartford Courant December 5, 2017) An Opinion:
Dan Haar: Open casino debate on; may the best team win (The Connecticut Post December 6, 2017)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Tribes
sue Trump administration for dragging feet on revised gaming agreements (November 30, 2017)Tribes report mixed slot machine returns as they press Trump team on casino (November 16, 2017)
Tribes hit roadblocks as Trump team refuses to sanction new gaming agreements (November 10, 2017)
Lawmakers join tribes in pressing Trump team for firm response on new casino (November 8, 2017)
Tribes seek stronger response from Trump team on new Connecticut casino (November 1, 2017)
Tribes spar with Obama's former Interior secretary over new casino in Connecticut (October 25, 2017)
Mohegan Tribe believes Trump team accepted new casino despite murky response (September 27, 2017)
Connecticut tribes can't get clear answer from Trump team on bid for new casino (Setpember 19, 2017)
Connecticut tribes see another win as court refuses to rehear casino challenge (September 11, 2017)
Eastern Pequot Tribal Nation questions legality of new casino in Connecticut (August 17, 2017)
Tribes report mixed results in slot machine revenues at casinos in Connecticut (August 15, 2017)
Tribes in Connecticut await federal approval of revised gaming agreements (August 1, 2017)
Connecticut tribes sign new gaming agreements to account for new casino (July 20, 2017)
Tribes celebrate as governor in Connecticut signs new casino bill into law (June 28, 2017)
Tribes in Connecticut waiting on governor to sign bill for new casino (June 23, 2017)
Connecticut tribes welcome court decision favoring new casino law (June 22, 2017)
Connecticut tribes heap praise on senior Trump administration official (June 14, 2017)