The tribe broke ground on the casino in the spring of 2016 and plans called for the first phase to open this summer. The lawsuit derailed the project, with opponents bringing up the U.S. Supreme Court decision Carcieri v. Salazar. In the 2009 case , the justices held that the BIA can place land in trust only for those tribes that were "under federal jurisdiction" in 1934. The Mashpees didn't gain formal recognition until 2007, long after that date. The BIA, during the Obama administration, approved the application on the grounds that the tribe and its citizens were living on a "reservation" in 1934. But a federal judge said that wasn't sufficient to address Carcieri , a ruling that prompted both the tribe and the government to appeal to the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals. The legal landscape shifted after President Donald Trump took office. In April, the BIA withdrew its appeal and told the tribe it was going to make a new decision on the land-into-trust application in June. That almost happened. Jim Cason, the Associate Deputy Secretary at Interior, gave the tribe a copy of a draft decision in which he was prepared to reject the application. But instead of going that route, Cason asked the tribe and opponents to submit more information by October 30. Based on the promise of a new decision, the tribe has stayed its separate appeal before the 1st Circuit. If the tribe ends up pursuing the appeal, it will be doing so without one of its strongest advocates. On July 17, attorney Arlinda Locklear, a citizen of the Lumbee Tribe who was the first Native woman to argue a case before the Supreme Court, withdraw as the tribe's counsel "Proceedings in this matter will be neither delayed nor otherwise prejudiced by the undersigned’s withdrawal inasmuch as remaining counsel for the tribe are able and prepared to prosecute the tribe’s appeal, notwithstanding the withdrawal of the undersigned," the motion stated. It was granted by the 1st Circuit two days later. Read More on the Story:
Court continues delay of Mashpee tribe's appeal (The Cape Cod Times August 14, 2017)
Tribe Appeal Pushed Back (The Mashpee Enterprise August 11, 2017) Federal Court Decision:
District Court of Massachusetts: Littlefield v. Department of the Interior (July 28, 2016)
Supreme Court Decision in Carcieri v. Salazar:
Syllabus | Opinion [Thomas] | Concurrence [Breyer] | Dissent [Stevens] | Concurrence/Dissent [Souter] Department of the Interior Solicitor Opinion:
M-37029: The Meaning of "Under Federal Jurisdiction" for Purposes of the Indian Reorganization Act (March 12, 2014)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Mashpee
Wampanoag Tribe urged to consider all options for stalled casino (July 20,
2017)Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe reportedly owes $347 million to casino firm (July 7, 2017)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe gets another shot at casino land-into-trust (July 6, 2017)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe shifts course on casino land-into-trust bid (June 28, 2017)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe remains confident of approval of casino (June 22, 2017)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe still waits on casino ruling from Trump team (June 20, 2017)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe awaits casino ruling from Trump team (May 8, 2017)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe praises development in casino dispute (April 3, 2017)
Trump administration given more time for appeal in tribal gaming case (March 17, 2017)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe enters new year with casino in limbo (January 2, 2017)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino in limbo amid change in D.C. (December 14, 2016)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe files notice of appeal in casino lawsuit (December 9, 2016)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe casino faces unknowns with Donald Trump in office (November 10, 2016)
Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe sees hope in casino land litigation (October 14, 2016)