The 1st Circuit disagreed with that contention. A three-judge panel said IGRA, which became law in 1988, takes precedence over the settlement. "Pursuant to IGRA, 'the operation of gaming by Indian tribes [is] a means of promoting tribal economic development, self-sufficiency, and strong tribal governments,'" Judge Juan R. Torruella wrote in the 23-page decision. Historically, the Supreme Court has been reluctant to accept Indian gaming cases -- only two have been heard between 2001 and 2016. A third, known as Patchak v. Zinke, is on the docket for the court's upcoming October 2017 term. Read More on the Story:
Town, State Ask U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Casino Case (The Vineyard Gazette August 8, 2017)
Town, state make case for Supreme Court intervention (The Martha's Vineyard Times August 8, 2017)
Supreme Court hearing sought in Aquinnah gaming case (The Cape Cod Times August 8, 2017) 1st Circuit Court of Appeals Decision:
Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah) (April 11, 2017)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Aquinnah
Wampanoag Tribe must wait to restart work on casino (May 23, 2017)Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe hails another win in gaming dispute (May 12, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe sees more opposition to gaming win (April 25, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe must keep fighting despite gaming win (April 21, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe welcomes decision in gaming dispute (April 17, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanaog Tribe scores major win in sovereignty case (April 11, 2017)
Aquinnah Wampanoag Tribe defends right to use land for gaming (December 7, 2016)