![](https://www.indianz.com/IndianGaming/2016/10/24/seminolecasinoblackjackroom.jpg)
Blackjack tables at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Tampa, Florida. Photo from Facebook Paul Seago of No Casinos, a group that opposes the expansion of gaming in Florida, wonders why the state authorized certain forms of non-Indian gaming when revenues pale in comparison to those received from the Seminole Tribe:
This case involves the 2010 compact between the tribe and the state. As part of that agreement, the Seminoles were granted exclusive rights to offer banked card games for a five-year period, in exchange for $1 billion to the state. The deal contained penalties if the state violated the tribe’s exclusivity, giving the public assurance that the compact would actually halt further expansion of gambling. In 2011, Florida regulators allowed pari-mutuels to offer so-called “designated-player’’ card games, a new game that – unlike traditional poker – features players trying to get a better hand than a designated player, who then pays out winners and collects from losers. While these games are certainly lucrative for the pari-mutuel owners, the state realizes little revenue from their play versus what is at risk by violating the compact. The FY 2014-2015 annual report from the Department of Pari-Mutuel Wagering shows that combined revenue to the state from all licensed card rooms was $14.3 million. In contrast, the minimum payment from the tribe to the state that year was $234 million. Why regulators would take this risk is baffling. Here is what is more baffling – these games appear to violate state law.Read More on the Story:
Paul Seago: State busts in legal showdown with Seminole Tribe (The Tallahassee Democrat 11/29)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Seminole
Tribe wins big decision in gaming dispute with Florida (11/10) Peter d'Errico: Seminole Tribe embraces limits on sovereignty (10/24)
Seminole Tribe accuses state of bad faith in gaming compact talks (10/03)
Donald Trump hired firm to lobby for tribal casino deal in Florida (09/29)
Seminole Tribe seeks decision in Class III gaming compact case (06/07)
Seminole Tribe starts work on scaled back casino expansion plan (6/1)
Seminole Tribe still going strong despite lack of new casino deal (05/24)
Seminole Tribe drops motion after gaming revenues published (05/13)
Seminole Tribe seeks court order to protect gaming information (5/12)
Florida racks up legal bills in gaming fight with Seminole Tribe (04/29)
Judge agrees to delay trial in Seminole Tribe's compact lawsuit (03/29)
Editorial: Courts hold the cards on Seminole Tribe's casino deal (03/24)
Seminole Tribe turns attention to courts after casino deal falters (3/23)
Seminole Tribe seeks delay in Class III gaming compact litigation (03/10)
Editorial: A 'shameful' delay on Seminole Tribe gaming compact (3/3)
Seminole Tribe faces setback for new Class III gaming compact (3/2)
Seminole Tribe wins ruling in employment case due to immunity (02/25)
Seminole Tribe's gaming compact takes a step forward in Florida (02/10)
Seminole Tribe plans $1.8B in gaming projects with new compact (02/01)
Seminole Tribe runs ad touting $3B in revenues in casino compact (01/27)
Seminole Tribe finally gets response to gaming compact lawsuit (1/26)