U.S. Senate candidate Kamala Harris (D) on the campaign trail. Photo from Facebook
California's politically connected tribes are mostly staying on the sidelines in this year's U.S. Senate election. The reason is that the leading candidate has a somewhat negative record on Indian gaming. As the state's attorney general, tribes say Democrat Kamala Harris failed to protect the exclusivity promised in their Class III gaming compacts by cracking down on non-Indian gaming and fantasy sports wagers. “She’s just failed to take positions on some critical issues … and that causes alarm,” Steve Stallings, the chairman of the California Nations Indian Gaming Association, told The Los Angeles Times. “Unfortunately, what it looks like is politics.” As attorney general, Harris opposed at least 15 tribal land-into-trust applications, Dave Palermo reported for Pechanga.net in February 2014. Her office also tried to stop the Big Lagoon Rancheria from opening a casino on land that was placed in trust more than two decades ago. Harris ended up losing the closely-watched case that drew alarms across Indian Country. But her reputation was still tarnished. "My guys are like, let’s just sit out of it,” one tribal lobbyist told the Times. Harris will face Democrat Loretta Sanchez, a member of Congress, in November. Sanchez had to apologize last year for making insensitive comments about Native Americans. Get the Story:
California tribes give U.S. Senate race the cold shoulder (The Los Angeles Times 6/22) En Banc 9th Circuit Decisions:
Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California (July 8, 2015)
Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California (June 4, 2015) Earlier 9th Circuit Decision:
Big Lagoon Rancheria v. California (January 21, 2014)
Join the Conversation
Related Stories
Native
voters in California face unique choices in Senate election (6/8) 9th Circuit won't reconsider victory in Big Lagoon Rancheria case (07/10)
California attorney general won't comment on Big Lagoon case (6/10)
Law Article: Big Lagoon Rancheria ruling clears air on casino land (6/9)
Law Article: Big Lagoon decision brings certainty to Indian gaming (6/8)
9th Circuit sides with Big Lagoon Rancheria in gaming site dispute (6/4)
Native caucus upset with Democrats in hot Senate campaign (05/19)
Rep. Sanchez apologizes for insensitive remarks and gesture (05/18)
Jack Duran: State's 'shocking' attack on Big Lagoon Rancheria (09/30)
9th Circuit poses tough questions in Big Lagoon casino case (09/18)
9th Circuit takes up Big Lagoon Rancheria gaming land dispute (09/17)
9th Circuit to broadcast arguments in Big Lagoon casino dispute (09/10)
Tribes closely watching Big Lagoon Rancheria casino land dispute (08/29)
9th Circuit sets oral arguments in Big Lagoon Rancheria dispute (08/27)
Patrick Sullivan: Indian Country watches Big Lagoon casino suit (06/27)
9th Circuit to reconsider Big Lagoon Rancheria gaming dispute (06/12)
Big Lagoon Rancheria asks 9th Circuit to rehear casino dispute (03/11)
Law Article: Court deals another blow to land-into-trust process (02/21)
NCAI President Cladoosby gives first State of Indian Nations (01/30)
Law Article: Decision raises questions about tribal gaming (01/27)
Big Lagoon Rancheria dealt another blow in gaming quest (01/23)
Bryan Newland: Big Lagoon decision bad for Indian Country (01/22)
9th Circuit bars Big Lagoon Rancheria from pursuing casino (01/21)
