Law Article: Court backs NLRB in Little River Band casino case

A view of the Little River Casino Resort in Manistee, Michigan. Photo from Facebook

Attorney Ryan Goellner discusses the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in a federal labor law dispute affecting the casino owned by the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians in Michigan:
The controversy in NLRB v. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians Tribal Government began when the Little River Ottawa Band’s Tribal Council amended the Tribe’s Fair Employment Practices Code to allow the Band to set the terms and conditions of collective bargaining, and “prohibits strikes, work stoppage, or slowdown by the Band’s employees. Thereafter, the NLRB sought to prohibit enforcement of some parts of the amended FEPC on the grounds that they violated the NLRA. The Band’s sole objection the NLRB’s order was that the NLRB lacked jurisdiction over the Tribe in this matter. The NLRB found it had jurisdiction, even after reconsideration in light of NLRB v. Noel Canning, 134 S. Ct. 2550 (2014), and sought enforcement of its cease and desist order in the Sixth Circuit.

The Sixth Circuit granted enforcement of the order. Judge Gibbons, writing for the majority (along with Judge Merritt), began by noting that the NLRA is a statute of general applicability, is silent as to Indian Tribes, and that Chevron was inapposite because the NLRB’s jurisdiction was “predicated on its analysis of federal Indian law and policy,” not upon a statutory interpretation. Next, the court noted that Indian sovereignty is derived from federal statutes, treaties, and “inherent” sovereignty, but that “the sovereignty of Indian tribes ‘exists only at the sufferance of Congress and is subject to complete defeasance.’” Then, citing a long list of sister circuits’ precedent, the court posited that “a federal statute creating a comprehensive regulatory scheme presumptively applies to Indian tribes,” and that the Ninth Circuit’s test from the 1985 case of Donovan v. Coeur d’Alene Tribal Farm for determining exceptions to this presumption was the appropriate framework to evaluate the NLRB’s jurisdiction.

Evaluating the case under Coeur d’Alene, then, the Sixth Circuit held that the Band could not take refuge under the two applicable prongs of the Ninth Circuit’s test. First, application of the NLRA to the casino did not undermine “tribal self-governance in purely intramural matters,” because the Tribe’s asserted protection of net revenues or Tribal laws did not show such a destabilization. Second, the absence of “Indian tribes” from the NRLA’s private right of action section did not demonstrate an intent to prevent the application of the NLRA to Indian tribes, because “Congress may choose to impose an obligation on Indian tribes without subjecting them to . . . a private right of action.”

Get the Story:
Ryan Goellner: Sixth Circuit approves NLRB’s jurisdiction over Michigan Indian tribe (Lexology 6/22)

6th Circuit Decision:
NLRB v. Little River Band of Ottawa Indians (June 9, 2015)

From the Indianz.Com Archive:
Tribal labor law rider killed by wide margin in House (June 27, 2005)
Federal labor board expands jurisdiction over tribes (June 4, 2004)

Related Stories
Appropriations bill blocks federal labor law at tribal businesses (6/22)
Brian Patterson: Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act restores our rights (6/19)
Debate on Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act moves to House panel (6/17)
House committee to hold hearing on Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act (6/15)
Law Article: Uncertainty abounds with federal labor law at casinos (06/15)
Senate committee approves bill to shield tribal casinos from NLRB (6/11)
Appeals court sides with NLRB in Little River Band casino case (06/10)
Senate committee takes up bill to shield tribal casinos from NLRB (06/09)
Chickasaw Nation wins major ruling affecting labor law at casino (06/05)
NLRB won't take stance on tribal labor bill that affects casinos (04/30)
Senate Indian Affairs Committee sets hearing on labor measure (04/27)
NLRB reaffirms jurisdiction over Little River Band gaming facility (09/17)
Supreme Court ruling affects NLRB proceedings at tribal casinos (08/07)
IPR: Court to hear union dispute at Little River Band's casino (10/08)
Little River Band won't accept NLRB jurisdiction over casino (03/22)

Join the Conversation