Here were some of the comments. “Actually, more transparency in the process for taking land into federal trust for non-gaming purposes would be good too, since once land is taken into trust the purpose can be changed later.” “Seems like an awful lot of hulabaloo about the casino. I can’t imagine more transparency there. The casino thing seems kind of karmic anyway. If it wasn’t a casino it would end up being another shopping behemoth where many other forms of unhealthy things are pawned off to the public. How about more transparency in government?”Get the Story:
Poll: More transparency needed in land-to-trust process for tribes (The Petaluma Argus-Courier 8/12)
Related Stories
Graton Rancheria
questions Dry Creek Band on casino claim (08/05)
Join the Conversation