"The Saginaw Chippewa Tribal Council, as was its right, retained the authority to decide how the money, calculated as 2 percent of the so-called “net win” from electronic gaming devices, would be distributed. It set up a formal grant-making system, forcing local governments to compete for the cash. The decision-making process remains shrouded in secrecy; the sovereign Tribal government has no Open Meetings Act.
Later gaming compacts with other Tribes set up different rules. There, the actual gaming compacts create local revenue sharing boards, dominated by civil governments with minimal Tribal representation, to hand out the money.
The 1993 compacts will be up for possible renewal next year. Advocates for local governments want more local say in how the dollars are distributed, and are looking hopefully at getting a better deal as part of a new compact. "
Get the Story:
Editorial:
Tribal 2 percent system could use improvement
(The Mt. Pleasant Morning Sun 6/3)
Related Stories:
Saginaw Chippewa Tribe shares casino
revenue with community (5/31)
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Pokagon Band's plan for another casino facility faces a local vote Opinion: Eastern Cherokee casino compact seems like a bad bet
Indian Gaming Archive