"Some proponents of internet gaming have used what I will refer to as the “Netflix argument” to urge Indian tribes to support various proposals to legalize internet gaming, even if the terms of the legislation are not particularly favorable to tribes. According to this argument, internet gaming is “inevitable” and unless tribes embrace it they will be left behind. They cite the example of Blockbuster, which they note failed to adapt quickly enough to changes in the movie rental industry introduced by companies such as Netflix. As a result, it is now in bankruptcy, forced to close many of its brick-and-mortar stores, while Netflix, which offers flat-rate online video rental and on-demand video streaming, is prospering. The proponents argue that tribes that fail to embrace internet gaming by supporting its legalization will face a similar fate. However, there is a fundamental flaw to this argument.
When Netflix began offering its flat-rate rental service in 1999, no change in the law was necessary to allow it to implement its new business model. Instead, Netflix came up with an approach that was more convenient for consumers and the marketplace rewarded it accordingly. In contrast, internet gaming in the United States is generally illegal as a matter of federal law. Other than companies operating illegally, internet gaming companies will be able to compete with tribal brick-and-mortar casinos only if there is a change in the law to allow such competition. The recent indictment of individuals associated with three major off-shore internet poker companies by the U.S. Department of Justice dramatically underscores this point.
Thus, the real question is whether Indian tribes should support a change in the law to allow competition from gaming offered via the internet. While internet gaming legislation may or may not be “inevitable,” the specific content of that legislation is far from certain. Some of the proposals that have been advanced would effectively exclude many tribes or force them to participate under conditions that are not at all favorable."
Get the Story:
Joseph H. Webster: The Power of Indian Tribes in the Debate Over Internet Gaming (Indian Country Today 4/19)
Related Stories:
Opinion: Key issues for tribal governments and Internet gaming (4/1)
Advertisement
Tags
Search
More Headlines
Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
Gaming initiatives backed by tribal corporation faces uncertain future
Chuck Hoskin: Renewed gaming compacts ensure a brighter future for Oklahoma
Republican governor suffers another setback in dealings with tribes in Oklahoma
Cronkite News: Gila River hotels, casinos close for two weeks after worker death
Cronkite News: Curfew curtailing casinos? Don’t bet on it, owners say
'We are thrilled': Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe hails victory for sovereignty
Tribes sue Trump administration after being excluded from coronavirus relief program
Donovan White: Standing up for Native Americans and Native American jobs
'Finally': Tribal gaming in line for coronavirus relief amid stiff competition for resources
Oregon tribes’ primary engines – casinos – stalled by COVID-19
Gaming initiatives backed by tribal corporation faces uncertain future
Chuck Hoskin: Renewed gaming compacts ensure a brighter future for Oklahoma
Republican governor suffers another setback in dealings with tribes in Oklahoma
Cronkite News: Gila River hotels, casinos close for two weeks after worker death
Cronkite News: Curfew curtailing casinos? Don’t bet on it, owners say
'We are thrilled': Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe hails victory for sovereignty
Tribes sue Trump administration after being excluded from coronavirus relief program
Donovan White: Standing up for Native Americans and Native American jobs
'Finally': Tribal gaming in line for coronavirus relief amid stiff competition for resources
Oregon tribes’ primary engines – casinos – stalled by COVID-19
Indian Gaming Archive