The Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians did not waive sovereign immunity in a contract with a casino vendor, a California appeals court ruled.
The tribe entered into a contract with California Parking Services for valet services at the Soboba Casino.
The agreement called for disputes to be settled by an arbitrator "acceptable to both parties."
But the contract did not contain a provision that would have allowed a state court to compel arbitration in the face of the tribe's sovereign immunity.
For that reason, the Fourth Appellate District upheld the dismissal of the lawsuit.
"Courts construe waivers of a tribe's sovereign immunity strictly and hold a strong presumption against them," the court wrote. "This hurdle
can only be overcome if a tribe's waiver was clear and unequivocal."
Turtle Talk has posted documents from the case, CPS v. Soboba Band.
Get the Story:
Tribal sovereignty clause omitted; appeal fails
(The Riverside Press-Enterprise 8/17)
California Appeals Court Decision:
CPS v. Soboba Band (July 20, 2011)
California | Litigation
Appeals court dismisses lawsuit for Soboba Band casino contract
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Menominee Nation settles lawsuit over off-reservation casino plan Dry Creek Rancheria reports four percent drop in gaming revenue
Indian Gaming Archive