"The June 4 My Turn "Allowing 'racinos' in Arizona would stimulate economy," (Opinions) suggested racetracks be allowed to offer casino gaming. As the former director of the Arizona Department of Gaming, I absolutely disagree. Arizona has more to lose than the tracks have to gain.
Pursuant to federal law, our tribal-gaming compacts were carefully designed to authorize tribal revenue sharing with the state. If tracks are allowed casino gaming, this provision is rescinded.
The state stands to lose more than a billion dollars over the term of the compact. And tribes will be allowed unlimited casino-gaming expansion in contrast to the limited gaming we have today.
Since 2004, tribes have contributed more than $600 million to the state and local governments in shared revenue. These are real dollars, not the tenuous projections that track advocates have promised if their casino gaming expansion occurs."
Get the Story:
Steve Hart: 'Racinos' would be a blow to lucrative tribal gaming
(The Arizona Republic 6/13)
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Fellow tribes against Jemez Pueblo off-reservation casino Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe looking at potential gaming sites
Indian Gaming Archive