The Department of Justice is urging the U.S. Supreme Court to reject Brown
v. Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians, a gaming compact case.
The 9th Circuit Court of
Appeals ruled that former governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) negotiated in bad faith with the Rincon Band of Mission Indians.
Government attorneys say the state's revenue sharing demands violated the purposes of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
"Payment of a share of a tribe’s gaming revenue to the state's general fund,
where it can be used for purposes having no relation to Indian tribes or gaming, does not further any of those purposes," DOJ wrote in the brief.
The Supreme Court asked for DOJ's views back in December.
9th Circuit Decision:
Rincon
Band v. Schwarzenegger (April 20, 2010)
Related Stories:
Rincon Band compact case still pending
at Supreme Court (5/23)
Supreme Court
asks DOJ for views in Rincon Band compact case (12/14)
California | Compacts | Litigation
DOJ submits brief to Supreme Court in Rincon gaming case
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
• Dry Creek Rancheria makes changes to gaming agreement• Sheila Morago joining Oklahoma Indian Gaming Association
Indian Gaming Archive