The California Gambling Control Commission has proposed its own version of the minimum internal control standards, or MICS, but some tribes are opposed.
The MICS cover just about every aspect of Class III gaming. The state proposed them after a federal court said the National Indian Gaming Commission lacked authority to impose them on tribes.
The state doesn't seem to be faring any better with its version. The California Tribal Business Alliance, a small group of tribes, says there is no need for the MICS.
"It’s a solution in search of a problem," Alison Harvey, the group's executive director, told Capitol Weekly. "The question is, for those tribes, why do we need yet another agency reviewing what is already under federal review?"
The comment period on the MICS closed August 11.
Get the Story:
State commission contemplates new casino rules
(Capitol Weekly 10/1)
Minimum Internal Control Standards:
Proposed Text |
Comment Summary and Response |
Notice of Proposed Action |
Initial Statement of Reasons |
Proposed Text
California | Legislation | NIGC
California weighs minimum control standards
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Firm back on track with off-reservation project Warm Springs Tribes hope for off-reservation
Indian Gaming Archive