A group called People Against a Casino Town can challenge the Class III gaming compact for the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled on Thursday.
The group questions whether the state governor had the authority to sign the compact. The group says the state constitution bans casinos.
The tribe opened the Three Rivers Casino in 2004 and has been operating under a federally-approved compact. Legal challenges to the Indian lands status of the gaming site were rejected in the federal and state courts.
"All this lawsuit is doing is wasting taxpayers money," tribal spokesperson Bob Garcia told The Oregonian. "If the residents of the state of Oregon want to end tribal gaming, stop the Oregon lottery, stop the Oregon slot machines. Then they can have a say in what tribes do in Oregon. Take care of your own house first."
Get the Story:
Court says group can sue over Florence casino
(The Oregonian 6/19)
Court Decision:
State ex rel Dewberry v. Kulongoski (June 18, 2009)
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
BIA puts off Graton Rancheria casino decision Montana tribe completing work on casino resort
Indian Gaming Archive