"This newspaper has been firmly opposed to casinos and racinos in Maine. We have said it's a poor substitute for economic development, runs contrary to our interest in preserving the image of Maine and has the potential to cause social problems such as gambling addiction.
Only two forms of legal gambling have been approved in Maine: the state lottery (worse than a casino because it's state-sponsored fleecing) and the racino in Bangor, which slipped in under the voters' radar the year that the Sanford casino was soundly defeated.
We have also been against the bill to allow the Passamaquoddy tribe to open a casino in Washington County (the bill failed) and have so far editorialized against the proposal to allow a casino in Oxford County that is a referendum question on the November ballot.
Yet ... we are beginning to soften on this issue."
Get the Story:
Editorial: Oxford casino gets 'no' vote
(The Central Maine Morning Sentinel 10/22)
Opinion
Editorial: Still saying no to gaming in Maine
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Seneca casino opponents want NIGC held in contempt Editorial: Don't be a sucker for gaming in Ohio
Indian Gaming Archive