Revenue-sharing provisions in Class III gaming compacts raise a "red flag," a Bureau of Indian Affairs official told lawmakers in California.
Paula Hart, director of the BIA's Office of Indian Gaming Management, said states cannot "impose" taxes, fees or other charges in compacts. But she said the agency will accept revenue-sharing as long as there is a significant benefit to the tribe.
"Whenever we see a revenue-sharing provision in a tribal-state compact, it sends up a red flag," Hart told the Senate Governmental Organization Committee, The San Diego Union-Tribune reported.
A federal magistrate adopted similar reasoning in holding that the state negotiated in bad faith with the Rincon Band of Mission Indians. The tribe wants to offer more slot machines but the state demanded a greater share of the revenues.
Get the Story:
Judge's ruling in Rincon case reflects BIA policy, official tells lawmakers
(The San Diego Union-Tribune 6/11)
California | Compacts | Litigation
BIA questions revenue-sharing in gaming compacts
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Teens charged in theft of Seminole winnings Stoney Nakoda First Nation debuts casino
Indian Gaming Archive