The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard oral arguments in a gaming compact case involving the Rincon Band of Mission Indians and the Colusa Band of Wintun Indians.
The tribes signed compacts in 1999 that theoretically guaranteed them up to 2,000 slot machines.
But limits set by the state prevent some tribes from reaching that limit.
The Rincon Band and the Colusa Band each went to court to try to enforce the 2,000 limit but two federal judges dismissed their cases, citing the failure to join other compact tribes as indispensable parties. The other tribes can't be forced to join the case due to their sovereign immunity.
According to The San Diego Union-Tribune, ,judges on the 9th Circuit questioned whether the other tribes were really indispensable parties. They wondered what interest the other tribes have in the Rincon and Colusa suits, which were consolidated on appeal.
Get the Story:
Rincon Indians make pitch for more slots on 2 fronts (The San Diego Union-Tribune 4/10)
California | Compacts | Litigation
9th Circuit hears California compact dispute
Thursday, April 10, 2008
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Shingle Springs Band to hire 1,750 for new casino Opinion: Put an end to Indian gaming 'monopoly'
Indian Gaming Archive