Tribes across the nation, but particularly those in states without a gaming compact, are fighting the National Indian Gaming Commission's proposed Class II regulations and standards.
Tribes like the Poarch Band of Creek Indians of Alabama and the Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska say the changes would wreck their economies. The tribes would have to stop offering certain electronic machines if the rules are adopted.
An independent analysis commissioned by the NIGC supports the tribal views. The Analysis Group said the changes would cost tribes in 10 states $150 million annually and lead to closures or partial closures of casinos.
Even tribes in states where Class III gaming is legal have concerns. Since Class II machines can be operated without state control, these tribes fear they will lose their bargaining powers.
Comments on the proposal are being accepted until January 31.
Get the Story:
Indian tribes oppose NIGC bid to change some gaming machines
(AP 1/28)
NIGC
Tribes fight NIGC's Class II machine proposal
Monday, January 29, 2007
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
• Editorial: Study impact of gaming in Connecticut• Editorial: Don't approve new California compacts
Indian Gaming Archive