$stalker
Commissioners in Clark County, Washington, dropped their legal challenge to a memorandum of understanding with the Cowlitz Tribe.
The county signed the MOU to provide services to the tribe's proposed casino. But legal questions arose because parts of the agreement conflict with the county's growth plan, which prohibits gaming.
The Washington Court of Appeals eventually ruled that the MOU amends and supersedes the growth plan. The county won't appeal the decision and won't enforce a provision related to water.
The tribe was recognized through the Bureau of Indian Affairs process in 2000. The tribe's land-into-trust application for the 152-acre casino site qualifies for an exception under Section 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
Get the Story:
No appeal on casino ruling
(The Columbian 12/7)
Casino Stalker
County won't fight Cowlitz Tribe casino agreement
Friday, December 8, 2006 More from this date
County won't fight Cowlitz Tribe casino agreement
Friday, December 8, 2006 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Viejas gaming commissioner tapped for NIGC post Cherokee Nation breaks ground on casino expansion
Indian Gaming Archive