"South Dakota tribes were smart to withdraw a threat against Gov. Mike Rounds - and other South Dakotans.
But they have a point, and it's one that ought to be considered.
The 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act gives tribes the right to conduct gambling operations, but they only can do so after reaching agreements with their states. Five tribes in South Dakota have such agreements, but they want to negotiate new deals - called "compacts" - so they can expand. They also want longer compacts, which would make it easier to use the gambling operations to encourage investors for economic development.
So far, the state has stalled such talks - even, as the tribes point out, slot machines in Deadwood have increased by more than 2,000 since 1990, and video lottery terminals across the state have grown by more than 6,000."
Get the Story:
Editorial: Renegotiate gambling compacts
(The Sioux Falls Argus Leader 10/21)
Opinion
Editorial: South Dakota stalls compact talks
Monday, October 23, 2006 More from this date
Editorial: South Dakota stalls compact talks
Monday, October 23, 2006 More from this date
Join the Conversation
Stay Connected
Contact Us
indianz@indianz.com202 630 8439 (THEZ)
Search
Top Indian Gaming Stories
Trending in Gaming
1 Catawba Nation continues work on controversial casino in North Carolina
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
2 Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes move forward with casino expansion
3 Poarch Band of Creek Indians said to be on Trump's radar
4 Hopi Tribe officially joins Indian gaming industry with approved compact
5 Seminole Tribe paid just $50M for casino Donald Trump built for $1.2B
More Stories
Editorial: Vote for Narragansett Tribe's casino DOI proposes Class III rules for Seminole Tribe
Indian Gaming Archive